Viewpoint: Why NICE's QOF proposals fall short

NICE has made a bold attempt to overhaul the QOF but the result will not be enough to reduce the burden on practices, argues Wiltshire GP Dr Gavin Jamie.

Dr Jamie: 'Ultimately it is going to take much more than this to really change the QOF burden for practices.'
Dr Jamie: 'Ultimately it is going to take much more than this to really change the QOF burden for practices.'

It is fantastic that the whole of the QOF can be reviewed in a public way. It is particularly pleasing that the [NICE QOF advisory] committee can look at many of the indicators that were originally suggested by its previous meetings.

However, removing cash without removing the work is really no solution to anything.

It does not reduce the pressure on practices; it does not make practices any more able to deliver care. In fact, it reduces the resources available to practices. It might make some areas simply unviable for practices.

This could be particularly dangerous in the so-called 'additional services'.

At the time of the new GMS contract a decade ago, the cash for these services, particularly cervical screening and contraception, was split between the global sum and the QOF.

GMS practices are completely within their rights to stop doing these and they may well do so if these services become unviable. They will lose a small amount of their global sum but cutting loss-making activities could be simply what practices need to do to survive.

Cutting these indicators will not reduce the burden on practices a great deal.

It seems likely that not all of the proposed removals will happen. The government has been reluctant in the past to remove the depression indicators when removal was previously suggested by NICE (interestingly in the same year NICE suggested the removal of the thyroid indicators).

Ultimately it is going to take much more than this to really change the QOF burden for practices. This is a good attempt to try to look at the QOF, but it is not at all clear if it will make any impact on the negotiations between NHS Employers and the GPC.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

£20 notes spread out

VAT trap for PCNs could strip millions of pounds from general practice

Tens of millions of pounds could be stripped from general practice because work carried...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Is the BMA representing GPs effectively, why GPs face a pension tax hit, and views on the workload crisis

In our regular news review the team discusses representation of GPs, a new survey...

Man sleeping

NICE guidance on insomnia backs app to replace sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people with insomnia could be offered treatment via a mobile...

Health worker prepares a dose of COVID-19 vaccine

JCVI backs autumn COVID-19 booster campaign for high-risk adults and NHS staff

Frontline health and social care staff and adults at increased risk of severe illness...

GP consultation

Government accused of 'misleading' claims on general practice workforce

GP leaders have accused the government of making misleading claims about the general...

Consulting room door

LMC calls for enhanced access to be scrapped after abuse forces practice to close reception

A Midlands LMC has backed a practice forced to close its reception desk after abuse...