Viewpoint: NHS 111 should be scrapped

NHS 111 is not fit for purpose and creates inappropriate work for GPs and A&E, says Dr Saqib Anwar.

NHS 111 has failed and should be scrapped. It was an ill planned and ill-conceived political creation that in my mind is not fit for purpose.

While there were many concerns that were expressed at its inception the political will was such that it unfortunately fell on deaf ears. The 111 service which, on the whole, is staffed by non-clinically trained operators has resulted in a risk-averse triage system that has put unnecessary pressure on already strained A&E and GP services.

I have seen significant increases in volume of inappropriate work being directed towards GPs and A&E by 111.  While the intentions may have been noble the service in my mind is an additional needless barrier that exists between patients and their ability to receive proper and timely care. 

What is wrong with NHS 111?

So what is actually wrong with the service? Firstly, any system that is designed and centred around non clicnians entering data into pre-agreed computerised pathways for issues as serious and complicated as health is naturally going to be fraught with difficulties.

Humans and their illnesses are complex and to think that a non-clinical person, through series of negative and positive questions, would be properly able to contextualise and advice the patient is, to put it bluntly, beggars belief.  

As a clinician I know that problems and people do not fit nicely into pre-defined silos of classical presentation and so the fail safe in all of this will inevitably be to see a GP or seek health advice from a healthcare specialist. 

The second problem is the staffing and support structures of 111 providers are not uniform and so the experience for patients is certainly not uniform. It very much results in a postcode lottery and further enhances the health service inequality within the NHS.  

It is fair to say that some providers have really struggled to provide adequate levels of clinical cover to their call handlers and this in itself poses a major safety risk and concern. If I would not happy for my family to be using this service then why do I accept it for my patients?

Doctors have a moral, professional and ethical duty to stand up and speak especially where they feel that patient care is being compromised. Through 111 ineffective and inappropriate use of healthcare resource is being allowed to continue unchecked all in an environment where resource and funding are sacrosanct.  

Discharge paperwork

The third problem with NHS 111 has to be the reams and reams of paper that they generate as supposed discharge summaries for patients that have called the service. GPs who have multiple constraints on their time already are subject to pages and pages of protolised negative responses and often struggle to find the reason for the persons contact.

No one seems to want to address this broken facet of the 111 journey, and many GPs are resigned to accept this as the norm.

The fourth problem is the additional layer that NHS 111 creates. For some patients this means rehearsing their story potentially four times before they can finally receive treatment for their problem.

The journey starts with a call handler, who passes to a nurse who states that need to speak to a doctor, who then arranges for visit to the patient. As a visiting clinician I am usually the third if not fourth person the patient or their representative may have spoken to that day and is it surprising that they are a little annoyed?

While the idea of a unified number for non-emergencies is welcomed by patients and users of the service, the reality on the ground is that is not working for anyone. The current system is unsafe and fundamentally flawed and patients deserve better. In its current form we should all be calling for an end to this less than optimal service. 

  • Dr Saqib Anwar is medical secretary of Leicester, Leicestershire & Rutland LMC

Picture: Pete Hill

    Have you registered with us yet?

    Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

    Register

    Already registered?

    Sign in

    Follow Us:

    Just published

    Under 40s to be offered alternative to AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine

    Under 40s to be offered alternative to AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine

    Patients aged 30-39 will be offered an alternative to the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19...

    GPs per patient down 10% in just five years, NHS data reveal

    GPs per patient down 10% in just five years, NHS data reveal

    The number of fully-qualified, full-time equivalent (FTE) GPs per patient in England...

    Supportive model must replace harmful CQC inspections, BMA chair warns

    Supportive model must replace harmful CQC inspections, BMA chair warns

    CQC inspections that ‘divert time away from patient care’ and ‘instil fear’ among...

    UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

    UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

    GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...

    A 'tsunami' of work is drowning general practice: GPs speak out about a profession at its limit

    A 'tsunami' of work is drowning general practice: GPs speak out about a profession at its limit

    Rocketing workloads created by huge backlogs of cases and continuing COVID-19 disruption...

    Slight increase in GP workforce during past year, but number of partners continues to fall

    Slight increase in GP workforce during past year, but number of partners continues to fall

    The GP workforce grew by 0.4% in the year to March 2021, but the number of GP partners...