Viewpoint: Gerada was right to spark independent contractor debate

Writing for GPonline.com, BMA deputy chairman Dr Kailash Chand sifts through the pros and cons of losing independent contractor status - and finds it's no easy decision.

Dr Kailash Chand: just how independent are GPs?
Dr Kailash Chand: just how independent are GPs?

Professor Clare Gerada, the outgoing RCGP chairwoman, caused something of a stir last week when she called for a debate about the future of GPs' independent contractor status.

It was a call that has undoubtedly worked, with a great deal of discussion now taking place, not least on GP’s website.

On the one hand, it is obvious why some GPs might be attracted to this idea. In theory it could lead to a better working environment while at the same time keeping GPs within the NHS and focused on patient care.

But attractive as this sounds, will many GPs willing give up their independent contractor status? Most of the GPs I know don't want to be a doctor who clocks in and clocks out nor do they want their patients to view them as someone like that. They want to be intimately involved with patients in planning services and getting things right at a local level – one of the key functions of the independent contractor status that helps embed GPs in their local communities.

Equally, many will no doubt cast a wary look to the sky at the huge reorganisation that will have to come with sweeping away the independent contractor status: it would be a huge administration task to switch all UK GPs from one model to another.

I suspect most GPs, though certainly not all, will want to stick with their current status, but before we put this debate to rest, it is worth examining the current 'independent' status and ask, is it really as independent as we might like to think it is?

The NHS Act 2012 has resulted in more mandatory competition which is affecting many GPs and last year the GP contract was subject to imposed changes that resulted in a wave of pointless yet time consuming box ticking.  Some of these targets are clearly politically, rather than clinically, driven.

In this context, we could question what sort of independence GPs increasingly have.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

First MDO completes switch to state-backed GP indemnity across England and Wales

First MDO completes switch to state-backed GP indemnity across England and Wales

The Medical Protection Society (MPS) has become the first of the three main providers...

GPs face unsustainable pressure, warns GMC report on doctors' wellbeing

GPs face unsustainable pressure, warns GMC report on doctors' wellbeing

GPs are working under intense and unsustainable pressure that has eroded their relationship...

'Unrealistic' wage bands could mean PCNs lose funding for new staff

'Unrealistic' wage bands could mean PCNs lose funding for new staff

Salary bands for clinical pharmacists working in primary care networks (PCNs) are...

GP at Hand now has third largest patient list in England

GP at Hand now has third largest patient list in England

Controversial digital-first provider GP at Hand now has the third largest registered...

Viewpoint: 'Why the RCGP should change its stance on assisted dying'

Viewpoint: 'Why the RCGP should change its stance on assisted dying'

The RCGP is currently surveying members for their views on assisted dying. Dr Zoe...

RCGP urges caution over call to scrap home visits

RCGP urges caution over call to scrap home visits

Workload pressures are forcing GP practices into tough decisions about which services...