Three quarters of doctors report negative health impact following GMC investigation

Three quarters of doctors believe that being involved in a GMC investigation had a detrimental impact on their physical or mental health, according to a survey.

GMC: investigations impact on doctors (Photo: JH Lancy)
GMC: investigations impact on doctors (Photo: JH Lancy)

The survey of 180 doctors, carried out by the Medical Protection Society, revealed that half (52%) of doctors felt being investigated by the GMC impacted on their professional reputation and 76% that their personal life had been negatively affected as a result.

Almost a third (28%) considered leaving the medical profession as a result of their experience, while 2% actually did.

The majority - 70% - said they believed the GMC should do more to provide support to GPs undergoing an investigation.

Results are 'alarming'

Dr Richard Stacey, senior medico-legal adviser at the MPS, said the results were ‘alarming’ but ‘unfortunately not surprising’.

He said: ‘The attributes that make a good doctor (for example, being caring, kind and conscientious) can also make them particularly vulnerable if they become the subject of a GMC investigation.

‘A doctor can experience fear when they receive a letter from the GMC informing them that they are the subject of a GMC investigation. The GMC do provide information about their procedures to doctors who become the subject of an investigation, however the correspondence can appear formal and legalistic.’

GMC to improve support

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said he accepted the GMC could do more to support doctors and reduce stress during inspections, and it was working to achieve this.

He said: ‘Patient safety has to be our first priority, but we also recognise that we have a duty of care towards doctors involved in our investigations. Our procedures will always be stressful, and of course some of the doctors who are referred to us are already under considerable strain or have mental health problems.

‘The MPS recognises the steps we have taken to make our procedures less stressful. We have an ambitious programme to speed up the process, disposing of more cases without the need for a hearing, and setting up the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, a separate adjudication tribunal headed by a judge committed to fair and effective decision making.

‘At the same time we accept there is more we can do and we will work with the defence organisations, the BMA and others to find ways to support doctors and reduce stress where we can.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Woman holding face in pain

Should GPs treat patients presenting with dental problems?

The MDU's Dr Kathryn Leask considers what GPs should do if a patient presents with...

Conservative Party leadership candidate and foreign secretary Liz Truss

Liz Truss vows to resolve GP pension tax crisis if she becomes prime minister

Liz Truss has affirmed her commitment to resolving the GP pensions crisis but has...

Baby receiving a vaccine in their thigh

JCVI advises changes to routine childhood and HPV immunisation schedules

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has recommended a change...

GP consultation

General practice delivering 'up to double the appointments it is paid for'

General practice in England may be delivering as many as double the number of appointments...

Sign outside BMA House

GP suicide sparks calls for measures to protect doctors from spiralling workloads

The government and policymakers must do more to safeguard doctors and NHS staff from...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Living with long COVID

In August we’re bringing you some of the best interviews from series one of the podcast....