Test your knowledge on haematology

Read the article on haematology then answer these three questions to check your understanding. You may want to document your answers and any learning points to save in your CPD folder along with the article.

Read our clinical feature on haematology

Test your knowledge
Question 1

Question 1. An 83-year-old gentleman presents to your practice with gradual worsening SOB and lethargy. His medication includes levothyroxine and simvastatin.

Blood test results:

  • Hb 9.5g/dl
  • MCV 105 fl (normal range 80-100fl)
  • B12 90 nanogram/ml (normal range 145-1000ng/ml)
  • MMA 500 mmol/l (normal range 73-271nmol/l)
  • Negative intrinsic factor
  • Negative parietal cell antibodies.

Is this:

  1. Definitive pernicious anaemia
  2. Most likely pernicious anaemia
  3. Not pernicious anaemia

Answer: b

This is most likely pernicious anaemia. There is a macrocytic anaemia with low B12 level and elevated MMA. Even though both intrinsic factor and parietal cell antibodies are negative, we know that intrinsic factor is only present in approximately 50 per cent of patients and parietal cell antibodies highly non-specific. In this instance B12 levels are so low that MMA does not add to diagnosis. Without the presence of antibodies one cannot say this is definitely pernicious anaemia, however the absence of antibodies does not mean this is not pernicious anaemia. His history of hypothyroidism makes pernicious anaemia (another autoimmune disorder) most likely.
Question 2
Question 2:  What is your immediate management?

a. Referral to haematology

b. Admission to A&E

c. Single lM dose of hydroxocobalamin

d. Commence oral cobalamin

Answer: c

Anaemia in B12 deficiency develops slowly. So long as this patient is not haemodynamically compromised he does not warrant admission to A&E. He will benefit from a single IM dose of hydroxocobalamin which will correct the anaemia. He may be a candidate for subsequent oral replacement.

Question 3
Question 3: If a patient has a low B12 level, high MMA level, positive gastric parietal antibodies and negative intrinsic factor antibodies - how often would you test for intrinsic factor antibodies?

a. Repeat until positive result

b. Once only

c. Twice to confirm assay result.

Answer = b

Once only as the test is specific. Repeated screening for the development of intrinsic factor antibodies is unnecessary and will not make a difference in the clinical management of the patient if there is a high index of suspicion that the diagnosis is pernicious anaemia.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

BMA demands 'rule of six' overhaul to prevent further lockdowns

BMA demands 'rule of six' overhaul to prevent further lockdowns

The government must scrap its high-risk ‘rule of six’ and introduce more stringent...

Average GP practice list tops 9,000 after 30% rise in seven years

Average GP practice list tops 9,000 after 30% rise in seven years

The average GP practice list has risen beyond 9,000 patients for the first time after...

GP dilemma: What should I do if a parent sends their child with COVID-19 symptoms to school?

GP dilemma: What should I do if a parent sends their child with COVID-19 symptoms to school?

Medical Protection's Dr Clare Devlin offers advice on how GPs should respond to parents...

GPs risk missing out on vital COVID-19 risk assessments, BMA warns

GPs risk missing out on vital COVID-19 risk assessments, BMA warns

GPs risk missing out on COVID-19 risk assessments unless practices are guaranteed...

GPs call for partial suspension of network DES amid heavy workload

GPs call for partial suspension of network DES amid heavy workload

GPs leading primary care networks (PCNs) have called for the partial suspension of...

UK COVID-19 alert level raised as GPs prioritised for testing

UK COVID-19 alert level raised as GPs prioritised for testing

The government has raised the UK's COVID-19 alert level to four amid reports that...