System for handling complaints against doctors 'compromises patient care'

The current system for dealing with complaints against doctors damages their wellbeing and causes fear-driven working practices that could compromise patient care, researchers have warned.

The researchers, from Imperial College London, found that ‘poor processes, prolonged timescale and vexatious use of complaints systems’ are reducing the psychological welfare of doctors.

They added that these issues are driving doctors to practice defensive medicine including over-prescribing and sending patients for unnecessary scans and procedures.

Published in BMJ Open, the study asked over 6,000 UK doctors with past or current complaints against them to complete an anonymous online survey.

The majority (78%) of doctors said complaints procedures went on for too long and two fifths (39%) felt bullied by the complaints process.

Doctors said they worried most about professional humiliation (80%) following a complaint. This was followed by having a marked record (78%) and public humiliation (70%).

Around 9,000 doctors a year are reported to the GMC, resulting in around 160 being suspended or erased from the medical register.

Complaints process

Problems arise because many complaints are also investigated formally or informally by practices – meaning a doctor could be investigated a number of times for the same issue over a drawn out period, the researchers warned.

They added that perceived support from colleagues and management was associated with a reduction in these effects.

Two thirds (61%) of doctors said they felt supported by colleagues, and these doctors were 36% less likely to experience depression and 31% less likely to experience anxiety.

Lead author Professor Tom Bourne said: ‘Patient complaints are important and should be used to improve the care doctors provide. However, the processes used to investigate them should be consistent with the principles of natural justice.

‘The current culture of fear causes physicians to practice defensively, which is clearly not in the interest of patients and creates significant costs for the NHS. We must develop a system that’s fair and timely.

‘Authorities can help reduce the impact of these procedures on doctors’ wellbeing by imposing time limits on investigations, and making them more transparent and less adversarial. This will benefit patients by reducing defensive medical practice.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Failure to involve GPs in COVID-19 test and trace 'a disaster and a national shame'

Failure to involve GPs in COVID-19 test and trace 'a disaster and a national shame'

GPs and primary care teams should have played a key role in the UK’s efforts to test,...

RCGP chair 'livid' over attacks on general practice from 'armchair critics'

RCGP chair 'livid' over attacks on general practice from 'armchair critics'

General practice has risen 'heroically' to unprecedented challenges during the COVID-19...

Remote GP consultations a 'lifeline for the NHS' during pandemic, says Hancock

Remote GP consultations a 'lifeline for the NHS' during pandemic, says Hancock

The rapid switch to remote GP consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic provided...

COVID-19 disrupted training for four in five doctors, GMC survey shows

COVID-19 disrupted training for four in five doctors, GMC survey shows

The vast majority of trainee doctors have seen their training disrupted or limited...

GP practices face losses 'in excess of £50,000' as COVID-19 hits income

GP practices face losses 'in excess of £50,000' as COVID-19 hits income

GP practices across England are facing a significant loss of income as COVID-19 dries...

MPs explore GP workload cap and flag damaging impact of intense pressure

MPs explore GP workload cap and flag damaging impact of intense pressure

MPs have raised the prospect of a cap on GP consultations in an investigation into...