QOF does not save lives, researchers claim

QOF targets should be 'reconsidered and better aligned with evidence', according to UK research that found there was no link between practice scores and patient mortality.

Tickbox: QOF targets have failed to cut mortality, say researchers
Tickbox: QOF targets have failed to cut mortality, say researchers

University of Manchester researchers linked QOF scores from 8,000 GP practices in England to all-cause mortality data and data on premature deaths to check whether performance in the framework was reflected in the health of local communities.

But the researchers found that 'overall quality of care provided by practices - as measured by achievement across all clinical QOF indicators - was not associated with mortality rates in their localities for conditions covered by the QOF'.

Improvements in performance incentivised by the QOF were not associated with a reduction in premature mortality, the researchers said, suggesting that 'the impact of the incentive scheme has fallen far short of previous estimates'.

Narrow focus on QOF

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey criticised the findings. 'It's unhelpful to have a narrow focus on QOF as an incentive scheme and miss the more important fact that QOF funding is an essential part of practice funding that pays for staff who work in the practice,' he told GP.

'Whether a practice achieves against a narrow set of thresholds misses the point that the staff in practices, GPs, nurses and support staff are all working to deliver the best possible holistic care to their patients.'

The researchers, writing in the BMJ, said that deprivation, rurality and proportions of non-white people within populations were far more closely linked to mortality than variations in standards of care between GP practices.

'The apparent lack of large effect on mortality over the medium term may suggest that the QOF may not have been an optimal investment of health service resources,' they wrote.

'If incentive schemes continue to be used in primary care with the intention of improving population outcomes, indicators will need to be reconsidered and better aligned with evidence on which activities contribute to reduction of premature mortality.'

However, the researchers conceded that 'it is possible that there have been significant population benefits in terms of reduced morbidity incidence or improved quality of life, and that longer-term mortality reductions will ultimately accrue'.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Map: Which parts of England have the most patients per GP?

Map: Which parts of England have the most patients per GP?

Some CCG areas have almost twice as many patients per GP as others, analysis by GPonline...

10 ways to save general practice

10 ways to save general practice

Professor Rodger Charlton sets out ten changes that could make general practice a...

RCGP elects east London GP Professor Martin Marshall as new Chair

RCGP elects east London GP Professor Martin Marshall as new Chair

Professor Martin Marshall has been elected Chair of the RCGP and will take over from...

Rising patient numbers pile pressure on falling GP workforce

Rising patient numbers pile pressure on falling GP workforce

The number of patients registered with GP practices in England rose by more than...

Practice manager jailed after stealing £700,000 from GPs to fund gambling habit

Practice manager jailed after stealing £700,000 from GPs to fund gambling habit

A practice manager has been jailed for three years after stealing nearly £700,000...

GPs maintain high patient satisfaction despite rising demand

GPs maintain high patient satisfaction despite rising demand

The vast majority of patients are satisfied overall with their NHS GP service despite...