QOF approach lacks research support

Insufficient evidence exists to support the introduction or expansion of incentive schemes likes QOF, a Cochrane review paper has concluded.

Incentivising some interventions may direct effforts away from others (Photograph: SPL)

Researchers reviewed all available data on the use of incentives to reward primary care clinicians who improve the quality of their services.

They concluded that policymakers need to proceed with caution before setting up incentive schemes and think carefully about the way they are designed.

The team, led by Professor Anthony Scott and Dr Peter Sivey from the University of Melbourne, said unintended consequences were a particular problem with such schemes.

There was a possibility, they said, that incentives may not produce any effect, could have negative outcomes or that efforts could be redirected away from non-incentivised work.

The researchers said that, despite the popularity of these schemes, they could only find seven appropriate studies examining how schemes worked in practice.

Dr Sivey said that poor design led to substantial risk of bias in most of the studies assessed. 'In particular, none of the studies addressed the ability of primary care physicians to opt into or out of the incentive scheme or health plan,' he said.

The seven studies looked at interventions covering a variety of health-related issues.

These included asthma, diabetes, smoking cessation, childhood immunisation and cervical, mammography and chlamydia screening.

Dr Sivey said: 'There is little rigorous evidence about whether financial incentives do improve the quality of primary healthcare, or of whether such an approach is cost-effective relative to other ways of improving the quality of care.'

He said it was 'important' that data began to be collected to assess 'this critical issue'.

'There are ways of conducting high-quality research that could find solid answers,' he said.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said financial incentives have been shown to improve performance.

'QOF has succeeded in making quality improvements a core part of general practice,' she said. 'It has also helped to make real progress in addressing health inequalities.

She added: 'QOF is just one part of an overall framework for improving quality informed by professional standards. It is continuously reviewed and updated to reflect current performance and up to date evidence of best practice.'

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Close-up of a man loading a shotgun

BMA updates GP firearms guidance as digital marker goes live on EMIS

The BMA has updated its guidance for GPs on firearms licensing following the release...

Map pins

Severely underdoctored areas spread across nearly every NHS region

Severely underdoctored areas exist in nearly every NHS region across England, figures...


NHS bosses apologise for lack of consultation on practice takeover amid patient protests

NHS leaders have apologised and admitted they should have consulted more after choosing...


NHS backs 2.1% salaried GP pay rise from April as contract talks continue

NHS England has suggested salaried GPs are likely to receive a 2.1% pay rise from...


GP crisis threatens to wipe out millions of pounds in PCN income

General practice risks missing out on millions of pounds in funding this year because...

BMA sign

GPs reject 'insulting' contract as BMA issues stark warning over 'death of general practice'

GP leaders have rejected 'insulting' proposed changes to the GP contract for 2023/23,...