Public 'not interested' in elected health boards

Doubts have been raised over plans to roll out elected NHS boards across the UK after reports of poor turn-out and skewed representation in a pilot scheme.

Just 13.9 per cent of eligible people turned out to vote for members of the local health board in NHS Fife, part of a pilot costing £2.5 million.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'I think we should question the value for money of such schemes. While laudable, they are expensive and if they take away resources from front-line services they may be of questionable value.'

The BMA said the pilot elections showed there was 'little appetite' for such elections.

In early June, NHS Dumfries and Galloway and NHS Fife held the first elections for members of a local health board, part of a two-year pilot scheme in Scotland. Two 'non-statutory' alternatives will run in Lothian and Grampian.

But just 22.4 per cent of the electorate turned out to vote in NHS Dumfries and Galloway, and just 13.9 per cent voted in NHS Fife.

The coalition government's manifesto pledges to roll out elections for local NHS boards in England to increase local accountability in the NHS.

The BMA said the elections were a waste of money and not representative of the local population.

Dr Brian Keighley, chairman of the BMA in Scotland, said: 'At a time of economic hardship, the health spending budget is better spent providing vital services to the local population rather than a costly election process which has received a less than desirable turn-out.'

The BMA was concerned that those elected as members may use the position for political purposes.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in