Public health plans 'confused and inadequate'

The government's public health plans are 'confused and inadequate' and fail to follow the advice of last year's influential Marmot review, experts have warned.

Plans to 'nudge' people to be healthier have 'no evidence base' and proposed local health and wellbeing boards will become 'glorified talking shops', experts told MPs last week.

The House of Commons health select committee has launched an inquiry into DoH plans to reform public health in England and heard from witnesses in London last week.

The DoH has proposed creating health and wellbeing boards to oversee local public health work and a new national body, Public Health England.

Professor David Hunter of Durham University said the White Paper Healthy Lives: Healthy People was an 'underwhelming' response to a report by Professor Michael Marmot in 2010. Professor Marmot called for more action to tackle the social determinants of health to cut health inequalities.

Professor Hunter said he was 'disturbed' by plans to focus on 'nudging' people into better health.

'To see this as an issue of individual lifestyle change is to completely miss the target. The evidence base for "nudge" doesn't exist,' he said.

Professor Lindsey Davies, chairwoman and president of the Faculty of Public Health, which represents experts in the field, oversaw the UK's response to the flu pandemic in 2009/10.

She said it was vital that Public Health England retained the ability to speak freely.

'If Public Health England is set up as it is planned at the moment, as just one more directorate of the DoH, it will lose an opportunity to really speak influentially and authoritatively to the public about important public health matters. I think that would be a huge loss.'

Removing practice boundaries would make it 'hugely more complex' to collect essential data on population health,' she added.

Experts also questioned the accountability of public health organisations. The current set-up was 'a bit mixed, messy and chaotic', Professor Hunter argued.

While many people initially backed plans to hand control of public health to local authorities, many have retreated over concerns that recent gains may be lost in the transition, he said.

The lack of clarity over who would assume overall responsibility for local public health was an unresolved issue, Professor Hunter added.

Stephen Robinson

GP Online recommends

More Health Bill news

Read more

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Social distancing should be cut to 1m in practices, says new IPC guidance

Social distancing should be cut to 1m in practices, says new IPC guidance

Practices can reduce social distancing from 2m to 1m providing the continued use...

Working as a full-time GP in clinical practice is becoming unsafe, RCGP chair warns

Working as a full-time GP in clinical practice is becoming unsafe, RCGP chair warns

The government needs to understand that general practice is a 'safety critical occupation'...

Face-to-face care debate 'too polarised', says NHS England's top GP

Face-to-face care debate 'too polarised', says NHS England's top GP

The face-to-face care debate has become 'too polarised', NHS England's top GP has...

GPs can apply learning from COVID-19 pandemic to fight climate emergency

GPs can apply learning from COVID-19 pandemic to fight climate emergency

GPs can apply learning from the COVID-19 response to help fight the climate emergency...

GP who lost her job to long COVID urges doctors not to underestimate the condition

GP who lost her job to long COVID urges doctors not to underestimate the condition

A GP with long COVID has urged other doctors to listen to patients who have the illness...

GPs must demand strong voice in COVID-19 public inquiry

GPs must demand strong voice in COVID-19 public inquiry

General practice must ensure its voice is heard as national inquiries into the initial...