How the new GMS pay uplift was wiped out for GPs

Since the new GMS contract took effect in 2004, official data have charted the steady erosion of GP income after years of pay freezes and rising expenses. Nick Bostock reports.

Dr Watson: "We have rising workload and falling income"
Dr Watson: "We have rising workload and falling income"

In 2012/13, GMS GP partners earned under £2,000 more in real terms than they did in 2003/4, the year before the new GMS contract took effect.

Compared with their peak in 2005/6 after the QOF was introduced, partners' real-terms earnings across both GMS and PMS contracts were down almost a quarter by 2012/13.

These latest official data on GP income and expenses from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) confirm that years of pay freezes and rising expenses have eroded the financial boost the 2004 contract brought for general practice.

GPC member and Wessex LMCs chief executive Dr Nigel Watson says: 'The government was surprised when GP income rose more than it thought it would - GPs did better on QOF than expected. It has spent the past few years chipping away at that.'

Now, he says, the cuts have gone too far. 'It hasn't recognised workload has increased - we have rising workload and falling income. Why would new GP partners come into an environment like that?'

GP income and expenses reports provide a retrospective look at the financial picture for the profession, because of the time it takes to compile data from thousands of tax returns.

Given the absence of any further injections of cash since 2012/13 - the most recent year for which complete data are available - it is safe to assume that GP income is now back to pre-new GMS levels in real terms.

The decline has been steep. Since income peaked in 2005/6, GP partners' income fell by nearly a quarter in real terms in the following seven years, HSCIC data show (see graph).


Across GMS and PMS partners combined, GP income was £100,170 in 2004/5, the first year of the new GMS contract.

In 2005/6, when the QOF took effect, this rose to £110,000, which is equivalent to £129,994 in real terms in 2012/13.

By 2012/13 GMS and PMS partners' income had fallen to £102,000 (22% down in real terms from 2005/6).

For GMS partners, the fall was fractionally steeper, with income down 23% in real terms from 2005/6.

Between 2011/12 and 2012/13 alone, for partners and salaried GPs combined, income fell by a 'statistically significant' average of 1.4%.

Expenses, meanwhile, have risen in relation to practices' gross earnings every year since 2005/6.

In 2005/6, expenses accounted for 55.1% of partners' gross earnings across PMS and GMS practices, but by 2012/13, this had risen to 62.5%.

Dr Watson says rising expenses are compounding GPs' funding problems.

'The problem for GPs is threefold - falling income, rising workload and rising expenditure,' he says. 'Everybody is offloading their costs on to general practice - CQC fees, medical defence insurance is going up.

General expenses, heating and lighting, wages are going up - expenses are not standing still.'

For salaried GPs in GMS and PMS practices, average income also fell from 2011/12 to 2012/13, down 0.6% from £56,800 to £56,400.

The data also reveal differences in income changes between UK countries, with the fastest drop in income between 2011/12 and 2012/13 coming for GP contractors in Wales.

Partners in Wales saw income fall 2.4% in that period, from £93,300 on average to £91,000.

In England, income fell 0.9% from £106,100 to £105,100, while in Northern Ireland, income fell 0.6% from £92,800 to £92,200.

In Scotland, however, income rose fractionally, from £88,700 to £88,800 - a 0.1% increase.

Dr Watson says the different changes in income across the UK reflect the fact GPs now operate under 'four different contracts', and GPs in Scotland had benefited from 'productive discussions' with the Scottish government.

Dr Watson adds that he was not surprised to learn that GPs in south-west England earn less than anyone else in the country.

Variation in the past between GPs in different PCT areas was very wide, he says.

'We have been arguing for some time that our health economy is less well funded per patient than in other parts.'

Alarmingly, he warns that plans to phase out MPIG and PMS 'premium' funding are unlikely to reduce the gaps between practices. 'The figures can be diced and sliced in different ways,' he says.

Whether or not equity is moving any closer, income is on the slide for most practices and GPs are running out of ways to economise.

'For those who have stabilised it, they don't think they can work any harder,' says Dr Watson.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

London GP personally calling at-risk patients to boost COVID-19 vaccine uptake

London GP personally calling at-risk patients to boost COVID-19 vaccine uptake

London GP Dr Farzana Hussain is personally telephoning scores of patients who have...

Half of patients with possible cancer symptoms avoided contacting GP in first wave

Half of patients with possible cancer symptoms avoided contacting GP in first wave

Almost half of people who experienced potential cancer symptoms in the first wave...

GP premises need major investment to let PCNs recruit, warns BMA

GP premises need major investment to let PCNs recruit, warns BMA

Primary care networks (PCNs) are struggling to make use of hundreds of millions of...

NHS unveils £4.2m fund to tackle vaccine inequality

NHS unveils £4.2m fund to tackle vaccine inequality

CCGs with low uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in ethnic minority, marginalised or deprived...

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...

150,000 more people with learning disabilities prioritised for COVID-19 vaccine

150,000 more people with learning disabilities prioritised for COVID-19 vaccine

Around 150,000 more people will be prioritised for COVID-19 vaccination after the...