LMCs oppose GMC standard of proof change

LMC representatives backed a motion expressing great concern at the proposed change to the standard of proof in fitness-to-practise cases from criminal to civil standard. They also 'deeply' regretted the loss of professionally-led regulation.

A motion on revalidation supported a realistic process, not too demanding on GPs' time, with all groups of GPs being treated equally during the process, and revalidation linked to a rigorous appraisal system.

GP appraisal should be formative, with evidence-based changes and fully funded by new money.

A motion suggesting that the GMC no longer be funded by the profession was carried as a reference.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus