Letters, calls and emails: PCT-led practices offer care, not QoF

Dear Editor

I was surprised to read this week's headline 'PCT-run practices have 14% lower quality scores' for two reasons.

I am surprised that the difference is so small, and I am surprised by the apparent lack of understanding of most of commentators of what this means and the reasons for it.

I used to be a GMS partner and, although I work shorter hours, for a lot less money pro rata, I give as good or better-quality care as when I was a partner. A lack of available partnerships means these jobs are often filled by experienced, well-trained and motivated GPs, not the dregs as is implied.

The main issue is that there is no reason for PCT practices to spend time on the quality framework that they could spend on patient care. One of the nice things about working in a PCT practice is that you can put patient need first, rather than obsessing about how to make money out of them.

The quality framework is about income generation, not quality care. Many aspects of good care, like whether the patient feels listened to and involved in decision making (including deciding not to follow guidelines), are virtually ignored in the framework, as are many disease areas such as chronic pain, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic 'minor' mental health problems.

PCT-led practices do not benefit financially from increased quality scores as the minimum money is put into the practices to cover salaries and basic costs (at least in my PCT). The GPs do not receive performance-related pay.

Do you think a patient benefits from being 'exception reported', or put on a mental health register, as long as they are getting the right care?

The surprising thing is that we are only 14 per cent behind because we have absolutely no incentive to do much of the quality framework work which really doesn't benefit patients. It is naive in the extreme to think that the quality framework really represents good care; it merely represents what is easily recorded and counted.

The other issue is that it is usually poorly performing practices with huge healthcare needs that are taken on by PCTs. This is not a problem that can be instantly turned around, it takes years of work and patient education.

I remain unconvinced that PCT-run practices offer poor service.

Name and address supplied, Salaried GP, PCT run-practice.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

General practice faces a 'rebalancing' between face-to-face and remote consultations...

GP funding formula needs radical overhaul, report warns

GP funding formula needs radical overhaul, report warns

General practice needs more investment and a radical overhaul of its funding formula...

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

GPonline provides an overview of the key guidance relating to coronavirus, including...

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Tens of millions of COVID-19 jabs have been administered across England, but how...

How to avoid burnout as a doctor

How to avoid burnout as a doctor

Dr Patrice Baptiste recently suffered from burnout, here she offers some practical...

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...