Letters, calls & emails: No evidence of eGFR validation in elderly

Dear Editor

I read with interest your article on eGFRs (GP, 26 May).

I agree that excluding patients on the basis of age would be unethical, I also feel that it is unethical to label patients as chronic renal disease and put them on a renal register on the bases of an eGFR.

I can find no evidence that eGFRs have been validated in the elderly.

The renal register states that patient with stage 3 renal disease (GFR <60ml/min) should be on a renal register, but an eGFR is not an accurate way of measuring this.

I discussed this with consultant nephrologist from Norfolk and Norwich Hospital. He suggested that eGFRs should not be done on patients with normal creatinine (124mu mol/l should be put on a renal register. I feel that this as a practical solution, avoiding worrying elderly patients with normal stable creatinines unnecessarily.

I would appreciate Dr Donal O'Donaghue's opinion on this.

Dr Ciara Killeen, GP principal and former specialist registrar in nephrology.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus