Journals to stick with familiar HbA1c units

Academic journals will keep reporting HbA1c results for diabetes patients in the familiar percentage units after these stopped being used in June.

From June, the results of HbA1c tests will only be presented in mmol/mol units
From June, the results of HbA1c tests will only be presented in mmol/mol units

From June, the results of HbA1c tests will only be presented in mmol/mol units, which were introduced in 2009. Since the new units were launched, there has been ‘dual reporting’ of both units, but this is now due to end.

However, Diabetes UK’s journal Diabetic Medicine will continue using both units beyond June.
Diabetologia, the journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, has yet to start using the new units. After June, it will be using both the new and old units.

An extension of ‘dual reporting’ period to allow patients and clinicians to get used to the new units has been proposed by leading diabetes GPs (GP, 4 March 2011).

Other clinicians have also raised concerns about familiarity with the new units within the diabetes community.

Jill Hill, a diabetes nurse consultant at Birmingham East and North PCT, said that many clinicians were still working in ‘old money’. But extending would be ‘prolonging the agony’, she believes.

Dr Allan Struthers, professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Dundee, said: ‘The real problem is non-diabetologist hospital physicians who have patients with diabetes but have not taken on board the new units.’

Professor Eric Kilpatrick, a consultant in chemical pathology at Hull Royal Infirmary, said dual reporting may have been unnecessary. ‘I was all in favour of the dual reporting period,’ he said.

‘But I must admit that most people, including myself, have still just concentrated on the old units without really getting to grips with the new ones. This might just continue if the move to solely mmol/mol was postponed.’

Helen Hollern, diabetes specialist nurse facilitator for Cambridgeshire Community Services said the change in target figures would be confusing for patients and clinicians. Patients in her area will continue to be given their results in both units for the rest of the year, she said.

‘As long as health professionals explain clearly the new and old results I think that patients will slowly understand the changes,’ she said. ‘It will not happen overnight and will be up to the health professionals to make the changes as smooth as possible for their patients.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Subject access requests to GP practices increased by a third under GDPR

Subject access requests to GP practices increased by a third under GDPR

The number of subject access requests (SARs) GP practices receive each month has...

RCGP criticises GP at Hand video showing antibiotics prescribed for sore throat

RCGP criticises GP at Hand video showing antibiotics prescribed for sore throat

A promotional video for Babylon GP at Hand that shows a patient with a sore throat...

Review into overprescribing aims to give GPs power to challenge hospital scrips

Review into overprescribing aims to give GPs power to challenge hospital scrips

A government review of overprescribing in the NHS could see GPs given more power...

Submit your session ideas for the RCGP Annual Conference 2019

Submit your session ideas for the RCGP Annual Conference 2019

GPs can now submit ideas for sessions at the RCGP Annual Conference in Liverpool,...

Scottish GP workforce increases for first time in 10 years, figures show

Scottish GP workforce increases for first time in 10 years, figures show

GP numbers in Scotland have risen slightly for the first time in 10 years despite...

More than 16m GP practice appointments a year lost to DNAs

More than 16m GP practice appointments a year lost to DNAs

More than 16m appointments at GP practices are lost every year because patients fail...