Hospital adverts sideline GPs' knowledge

Wasn't one of the official reasons behind the introduction of Payment by Results (PbR) and Choose and Book that it would improve standards by ensuring that funding followed patients?

The reasoning was something like this: those units with the best reputations and the best outcomes would attract the most patients and thus the most funding. Conversely, those departments that were ‘not up to scratch' would either have to improve or cease to exist.

Of course, investing in quality and efficiency requires funds, so hospital managers have found themselves in something of a quandary over ensuring patient throughput to in turn ensure funding levels are maintained.

And given the emphasis put on learning from the private sector in the modern NHS, the answer was obvious - increased marketing and even advertising efforts.

So next week the DoH will publish a guide to advertising NHS services in a move that could see rival secondary care trusts battling like Sainsbury and Tesco in the local papers.

Already some trusts have started sending out glossy pamphlets explaining their services to GPs. Others have invested in software that tells them which local practices are not referring patients to their departments and have started cold calling those GPs to find out what they can do to ensure more referrals. Loyalty cards perhaps?

But this forgets that it is supposedly patients and not GPs who now make the choice of referrals. So what next, can we expect local hospitals to mailshot patients with two-for-the-price-of-one special offers? Or perhaps there is a new market for the call centre industry: ‘Good evening, madam. Our records indicate that you have expressed interest in a hip replacement. No, well we also have a very good range of cancer treatments available...'

And what funds this marketing effort? Money that could be spent on patient care.

Before ‘choice' and PbR - and in fact still in the rest of the UK outside England - we had a simple system for ensuring referrals went to the right place. It was called clinicians' knowledge.

For decades, GPs have had an expert knowledge of what services are available from what hospital, how long patients have to wait and the reputations of different clinics and consultants.

But in the era of choice, it seems that the profession cannot be relied on to continue to gather the information vital to the treatment of their patients, and so valuable NHS funds may be diverted to marketing efforts. This is an example of how the push to ‘modernise' can forget the basics.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Andrea Leadsom

DHSC confirms new minister responsible for general practice

Andrea Leadsom has been confirmed as the new DHSC minister for primary care and general...


Government must match consultants' pay offer in new contract for GPs

GPs have warned they could be forced into industrial action if the government fails...

Consultants in London on strike earlier this year

Consultants to vote on new pay deal to end strikes

Consultants will vote on a government pay offer that would increase salaries by up...

BMA England GP committee chair Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer (Photo: Sarah Turton/BMA)

GPs' willingness to take collective action will underpin contract talks

GPs' willingness to take part in 'once in a generation' collective action will underpin...

GP consultation

GPs out of work 'because practices can’t afford to hire them', warns GP leader

Growing numbers of GPs are struggling to find work - with some considering moving...

computer and stethoscope

Petition demanding SCA exam refund collects almost 2,000 signatures

Almost 2,000 people have signed a petition demanding refunds for doctors whose GP...