Herbal medicine 'could be outlawed'

Herbalism - DoH consultation revives debate over regulation of alternative practitioners.

The government is considering measures that would effectively outlaw herbal medicine.

Such a move is likely to be welcomed by groups who campaign for evidence-based medicine. But others warned that prohibition could make it harder to regulate herbalists, by driving them underground.

The proposal came in a DoH consultation on plans to subject alternative medicine to professional regulation. Experts argue that this would offer cheaper and more effective protection of public safety than attempting to regulate individual remedies.

The consultation was expected to consider how to implement regulation. But instead it reopens the question of whether statutory regulation is the best way to ensure public safety.

It offers alternatives including abolishing section 12 (1) of the 1968 Medicines Act, which allows herbalists to practice.

Professor Michael Pitillo, principal of the Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, who led a working group that fed into the consultation, said the move was a 'total surprise and entirely contrary to what steering group had been set up for'.

Questioning the evidence base for such remedies was reasonable, he said. 'But it is important to separate the need to demonstrate a treatment's effectiveness from the protection of the public.'

The DoH told GP it changed the substance of the consultation because 'the regulatory climate has changed considerably' since earlier consultations.

NHS Alliance chairman Dr Michael Dixon said that any move to regulate alternative medicines should be 'totally pragmatic'. 'The public are already seeing these practitioners,' he said. 'We need to be assured that they are safe and know what they are doing within the modality of those treatments.'

Some health professionals want a tougher stance on herbal medicines, however.

Professor David Colquhoun, professor of pharmacology at University College London said: 'Every other form of drug is tested for safety and efficacy. These guys have a complete loophole.'

He said many herbal medicines came in unstandardised doses, and statutory regulation would offer patients false reassurance that treatments were safe or effective. He urged GPs to oppose it in the consultation, which runs until 2 November.

jonn.elledge@haymarket.com

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

GP practices face losses 'in excess of £50,000' as COVID-19 hits income

GP practices face losses 'in excess of £50,000' as COVID-19 hits income

GP practices across England are facing a significant loss of income as COVID-19 dries...

MPs explore GP workload cap and flag damaging impact of intense pressure

MPs explore GP workload cap and flag damaging impact of intense pressure

MPs have raised the prospect of a cap on GP consultations in an investigation into...

GP training: Working remotely as a GP trainee during the pandemic

GP training: Working remotely as a GP trainee during the pandemic

Dr Zoe Brown was in her first year of GP training and pregnant as lockdown began....

GPs warn government off PCN-led test and trace system

GPs warn government off PCN-led test and trace system

GPs have rebuffed suggestions that primary care networks (PCNs) are ‘best placed’...

Map: Three-fold variation in GP practice list size between CCGs

Map: Three-fold variation in GP practice list size between CCGs

The list size of GP practices across England has grown rapidly over the past decade...

Advance decisions to refuse treatment - what GPs need to know

Advance decisions to refuse treatment - what GPs need to know

A recent case has underlined the need for GPs to communicate a patient’s known wishes...