GPC says consortia leaders must fit key criteria

GPs should avoid electing leaders to shadow consortia solely on the basis of a popular vote, the GPC has warned.

In a guidance paper to GPs, the GPC outlined a number of issues that need to be considered when developing 'transitional' leadership structures to take shadow consortia forward.

It warns that if a transitional leadership is elected solely on the basis of a popular vote, this could result in a leadership which is initially popular, but whose members 'may not actually possess the skills required to do the job'.

It says consideration should be given to whether it would be appropriate to require all candidates for leadership posts to meet certain competency requirements before being entered into an election.

‘This would limit the pool of candidates standing in the election by automatically rejecting any candidates who do not meet pre-specified competencies,’ the guidance says.

‘Shadow consortia: Developing and electing a transitional leadership’ says all GPs, including partners, salaried GPs and locums, should be able to stand for election for the transitional leadership.

‘This will give the shadow consortium access to the widest range of talent, including the many salaried and locum GPs with significant managerial and commissioning experience, and will hopefully increase the transitional leadership’s overall effectiveness,’ the guidance advises.

In a separate paper, the GPC warned that the NHS Commissioning Board may not approve consortia that ‘cherry pick’ like-minded practices and leave out areas with greater health inequalities.

It also said that it was likely that the NHS Commissioning Board will not sign off an individual consortium until it is clear that there is complete consortia coverage across an area.

In ‘The form and structure of GP-led commissioning consortia’ the GPC urged GPs who have decided on future arrangements to keep their plans flexible.  

It said: ‘The duties of consortia are known in general terms only. The detail is not known, and it is likely that this will influence the development of the structure and management of consortia.

‘It is therefore important to avoid making any firm agreements with PCTs, between practices, or other organisations at this stage: form must follow function.’

View our GP Commissioning Resource Centre

Tales from the Black Tower: Why do PBC people assume they’ll be leading consortia?

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published


GP leaders demand urgent funding to maintain safety in general practice

Underfunding and staff shortages in general practice have put patient safety at risk,...

Labour shadow health secretary Wes Streeting

Labour plans neighbourhood walk-in GP centres open seven days a week

Labour would set up new neighbourhood walk-in GP hubs that could be open seven days...

BMA sign

What questions is the BMA asking GPs to shape its vision for general practice?

GPs are being asked for their views on continuity of care, contracts, safe working...

Scotland's cabinet secretary for health and social care Michael Matheson

Primary care will need bigger share of NHS funding in future, Scottish health secretary says

The share of NHS funding that goes to primary care will have to increase if the health...

Sign pointing to hospital

NHS England seeks to clarify GPs' responsibilities when using advice and guidance

New guidance from NHS England has set out the clinical responsibilities and medicolegal...

Widespread joint pain - red flag symptoms

Presentations and red flag symptoms that may alert you to potentially serious conditions...