GP indemnity costs set to rise under government regulation plans

GPs could face increased costs under plans to regulate provision of medical indemnity, a government consultation reveals.

Portcullis House, Westminster (Photo: iStock.com/TonyBaggett)
Portcullis House, Westminster (Photo: iStock.com/TonyBaggett)

The government says its preferred option is to replace existing 'discretionary indemnity arrangements' with regulated cover - and that 'there could be higher overall costs of clinical negligence cover' under the new system.

GPs in Scotland and Northern Ireland - where there are no plans as yet to introduce state-backed indemnity in line with England and Wales from April 2018 - could be hit hardest by any rise in costs.

However, GPs in England and Wales could also face increased costs for cover to carry out non-NHS work. The consultation document also warns that the transition to regulated cover could trigger further disruption because 'current providers may be unable to, or choose not to, continue to provide cover'.

State-backed indemnity

Plans to regulate indemnity come just days after the government in England confirmed that it planned to fund the much-anticipated state-backed indemnity package due to take effect next year from 'existing resources allocated for general practice'. LMCs last month expressed their 'outrage' at the move.

A regulated model could drive up costs, the consultation warns, because 'as providers of discretionary clinical negligence indemnity would have to comply with regulation in order to continue to sell clinical negligence cover to regulated healthcare professionals, this could be reflected in an overall higher cost of cover for the professional'.

The case made by the government for switching to a regulated model is that under the current discretionary system 'unlike commercial insurance companies, they have no contractual obligation to meet the cost of any claim against the professionals they cover', and 'no legal obligation to ensure they have the reserves to cover the cost of claims'.

The government also argues that a requirement for indemnity providers to disclose their full financial provision would provide more clarity for health professionals about the extent of their cover and offer them greater guarantees on financial conduct and fair treatment.

Legislation

The consultation document says the government hopes to 'change legislation to ensure that all regulated healthcare professionals in the UK not covered by a state-backed indemnity scheme hold appropriate clinical negligence cover that is subject to appropriate supervision, in the case of UK insurers, by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)'.

MDDUS chief executive Chris Kenny said there was 'little evidence to support the proposals', warning: 'This consultation is yet another missed opportunity to tackle the real issues that drive rising costs for healthcare professionals.'

He added: 'Instead of supporting choice and proposing concrete actions on legal reform that would make a real difference, the government is seeking to impose a cost increase on health professionals by moving to an insurance based model that will attract a 12% insurance premium tax.

'Patients will not be better protected – the document acknowledges that there is no evidence of harm in the UK from the current discretionary model. Doctors and dentists will gain no benefit. The only winner is the Treasury with its additional 12% premium tax income.'

MPS chief executive Simon Kayll said: 'We are working with the government on their proposal to regulate professional indemnity.

'We are already exploring the best way to offer members an insurance product. Any proposals to introduce regulation will be subject to public consultation and require legislation, so it will be some time before the details are agreed and any changes implemented.'

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

The one-day, virtual Medeconomics Live conference aims to provide practices with...

GPs face wave of abuse and complaints after NHS England face-to-face appointments claims

GPs face wave of abuse and complaints after NHS England face-to-face appointments claims

GP practices have faced a wave of abuse and complaints after a letter from NHS England...

Government denies plan to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of COVID-19 testing

Government denies plan to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of COVID-19 testing

The government has denied plans to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of the struggling COVID-19...

Expansion of NHS 111 service could see direct GP booking extended

Expansion of NHS 111 service could see direct GP booking extended

Plans to expand NHS 111 under measures to prepare the health service for winter could...

Red flag symptoms: Amenorrhoea

Red flag symptoms: Amenorrhoea

Possible causes and red flag symptoms to look out for when menstrual periods either...

GPs demand priority COVID-19 testing to secure workforce in second wave

GPs demand priority COVID-19 testing to secure workforce in second wave

GPs should be among NHS staff prioritised for COVID-19 tests, the RCGP has warned...