GP backs practice boundary abolition but wants power to refuse patients

The DoH should push ahead with plans to remove practice boundaries but must allow GPs to refuse patients if it is logistically complex to take them on, a senior GP has said.

Dr Kingsland: ‘If patients are so far logistically removed and arrangements are complex it would not be in patients’ best interest I would want to be able to say no.’
Dr Kingsland: ‘If patients are so far logistically removed and arrangements are complex it would not be in patients’ best interest I would want to be able to say no.’

Talking to GP, DoH national clinical commissioning network lead for England Dr James Kinglsand said practice boundaries should be removed despite some concerns from the profession.

He said patient choice must be ‘paramount’ and patients must have flexibility in their choice of GP practice.

But Dr Kingsland said there should be ‘some arbitration’ to allow GPs to refuse patients if it is logistically difficult to take them on to their lists.

He said: ‘I would want the ability for general practice to have some choice themselves.

‘If patients are so far logistically removed and arrangements are so complex it would not be in patients’ best interest I would want the ability to say no.’

He said the NHS Commissioning Board, or whoever holds GP contracts, would act as the arbitrator. But he said the decisions about whether to take on patients would not be an exact science.

‘We need to give patients choice and not remove them from our lists just because they move across a border.

‘But we need to get the principles and logistics right. There is no right or wrong answer.’

It echoes comments made earlier this year by Conservative Medical Society chairman Dr Paul Charlson who said GPs should be able to refuse patients with no link to a local area once practice boundaries are removed.

But GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said this would be a ‘recipe for disaster’ as it would leave GPs open to accusations of discriminatory behaviour.

He said: ‘The risk of practices being accused of accepting one type of patient not another would place them in serious legal jeopardy. This is not the way we would want general practice to go.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

External wall of GP surgery with wording 'medical centre'

‘Utterly toxic’: GPs speak out over abuse and physical attacks on practice teams

GPs have condemned a rise in verbal and physical attacks on practice staff - warning...

Artist's image of a spiked virus

Javid warns of 'substantial risk' from new COVID-19 variant

The highly mutated COVID-19 variant B.1.1.529 'may pose a significant risk to public...

Desk with lettering 'LMC conference'

LMCs reject 'outdated' GMS contract and demand move to item of service payments

LMCs have voted to scrap the 'outdated and inadequate' GMS contract and to replace...

GPs at an LMC conference waving green voting cards in the air

LMCs demand ringfence on enhanced services cash and clear GP representation in ICSs

LMCs have called for a ringfence on enhanced services funding, along with a guarantee...

Close up of hands typing on a computer

Practices should not be required to provide online consultations, say LMCs

Online consultations should no longer be a part of the GMS contract and targets for...

Sign outside BMA House

More than half of GP practices prepared to pull out of PCNs, BMA ballot shows

More than half of GP practices in England are prepared to opt out of the PCN DES...