GMC ready for challenge over proof

The GMC is bracing itself for a High Court challenge in the wake of lowering the standard of proof in fitness-to-practise cases, according to its president.

GMC president Professor Sir Graeme Catto said: 'It is a new law and should any doctor feel it wasn't applied fairly, I suspect, as with any major change, we will end up in the High Court.'

The introduction of the civil standard of proof in fitness-to-practise cases, rather than the criminal standard, will start from April 2008, the GMC hopes.

The GMC has published a summary of responses to the consultation on how the changes should be implemented.

Almost without exception, responses from individual members of the profession argued against the civil standard of proof, the report said.

The GMC president was defiant, saying: 'We are talking about 50 doctors out of all the doctors in the country.'

The consultation was meant to establish how to implement the changes, but the BMA was frustrated that there was no consultation on whether to make the changes in the first place.

Paul Phillip, GMC director of standards and fitness to practise, said there were many organisations in favour of the move and that most government regulators used the civil standard. He later admitted that the majority of health organisations were probably against the move.

GPC chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said the BMA would continue to fight to reverse the decision. 'Doctors remain to be convinced. Under huge pressure, in high-profile cases, you can see the GMC making decisions that might not be fair.'

Sir Graeme said: 'It would be helpful if the BMA had seen the advantage of the move. It allows us to address the less serious cases we see to ensure doctors abide by conditions of practice.'

Under the new standard, a fact will be established if it is more than likely to have happened. The current criminal standard means a case must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The GMC has said the civil standard will be flexible, meaning serious allegations will require more convincing evidence.

tom.ireland@haymarket.com

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

£20 notes spread out

VAT trap for PCNs could strip millions of pounds from general practice

Tens of millions of pounds could be stripped from general practice because work carried...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Is the BMA representing GPs effectively, why GPs face a pension tax hit, and views on the workload crisis

In our regular news review the team discusses representation of GPs, a new survey...

Man sleeping

NICE guidance on insomnia backs app to replace sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people with insomnia could be offered treatment via a mobile...

Health worker prepares a dose of COVID-19 vaccine

JCVI backs autumn COVID-19 booster campaign for high-risk adults and NHS staff

Frontline health and social care staff and adults at increased risk of severe illness...

GP consultation

Government accused of 'misleading' claims on general practice workforce

GP leaders have accused the government of making misleading claims about the general...

Consulting room door

LMC calls for enhanced access to be scrapped after abuse forces practice to close reception

A Midlands LMC has backed a practice forced to close its reception desk after abuse...