Expert patient programmes questioned

Researchers in this week's BMJ have questioned whether expert patient programmes consume fewer health resources.

Expert patient programmes questioned
Expert patient programmes questioned

The expert patient programme has been heavily promoted by the Government as part of a drive to reduce the use of acute heath care and deliver long-term cost savings.

In 2001, the chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, concluded that self management programmes for chronic diseases would improve health status, slow the progression of disease, and reduce healthcare use, and that the NHS should invest heavily in the expert patient programme.

To date, the Department of Health has invested £18 million in the programme, which will be rolled out to 100,000 patients by 2012.

Yet four trials indicate that although lay led programmes may increase patients’ confidence to manage their disease, there is little evidence to date that they make an important impact on either hospital admissions or the use of other healthcare resources in the NHS.

Although improvements in confidence are welcome, questions remain about its impact on health in patients in the UK, say the authors from Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry in London.

They suggest that lay led programmes in the UK need evaluation before they can be  recommended over other programmes with established impact.

They also point out that primary care trusts or general practice commissioning groups will need to consider carefully the costs of investing in this programme compared with other rehabilitation programmes for chronic disease.

What do you think? Comment below or email  

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in