Exclusive: Pounds-per-patient may replace UK GMS pay formula

The formula that calculates core pay for GMS practices could be scrapped in favour of a simpler payment per patient under plans to phase out the minimum practice income guarantee (MPIG), accountants believe.

Laurence Slavin:  Carr-Hill likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula'
Laurence Slavin: Carr-Hill likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula'

Laurence Slavin, a partner with specialist medical accountants Ramsay Brown and Partners, said the DoH may opt to scrap the formula as part of a move to unify GP contracts.

The GPC and NHS Employers have agreed to review the Carr-Hill formula, which weights core practice funding based on factors including the age and sex of patients, in negotiations over the next year.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey has said discussions on reforming Carr-Hill were left out of this year's contract negotiations.

He said a lack of funding meant that changing the formula would have triggered a redistribution of the MPIG top-up payments brought in to protect practices from losing out when the formula was introduced in 2004.

Around 65% of GMS practices still rely on MPIG top-ups to bring their income up to the level they received before the 2004 contract, meaning their funding does not reflect Carr-Hill weighting.

Significant new funding is unlikely to be available for some time, but politicians and the GPC are keen to phase out the MPIG.

The GPC wants to remove reliance on MPIG by increasing the value of global sum payments.

Plans set out last year in the White Paper Liberating the NHS to move to a single GP contract were 'part of a drive to get rid of MPIG' according to DoH national clinical commissioning network lead for England Dr James Kingsland.

Labour shadow health secretary Andy Burnham told GP recently that the 2004 contract was a 'mistake' because of the MPIG.

Mr Slavin suggested the government may opt to scrap Carr-Hill altogether rather than continue to reform it. He said it was likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula', which could see GPs suffer 'significant' reductions in income, with some practices 'easily losing out on tens of thousands of pounds'.

'It is very unlikely that there would be any winners in this situation. The view at the centre is that GPs are overpaid, so I don't think they would have any qualms in reducing GP income,' Mr Slavin said.

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

General practice faces a 'rebalancing' between face-to-face and remote consultations...

GP funding formula needs radical overhaul, report warns

GP funding formula needs radical overhaul, report warns

General practice needs more investment and a radical overhaul of its funding formula...

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

GPonline provides an overview of the key guidance relating to coronavirus, including...

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Tens of millions of COVID-19 jabs have been administered across England, but how...

How to avoid burnout as a doctor

How to avoid burnout as a doctor

Dr Patrice Baptiste recently suffered from burnout, here she offers some practical...

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...