Exclusive: Pounds-per-patient may replace UK GMS pay formula

The formula that calculates core pay for GMS practices could be scrapped in favour of a simpler payment per patient under plans to phase out the minimum practice income guarantee (MPIG), accountants believe.

Laurence Slavin:  Carr-Hill likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula'
Laurence Slavin: Carr-Hill likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula'

Laurence Slavin, a partner with specialist medical accountants Ramsay Brown and Partners, said the DoH may opt to scrap the formula as part of a move to unify GP contracts.

The GPC and NHS Employers have agreed to review the Carr-Hill formula, which weights core practice funding based on factors including the age and sex of patients, in negotiations over the next year.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey has said discussions on reforming Carr-Hill were left out of this year's contract negotiations.

He said a lack of funding meant that changing the formula would have triggered a redistribution of the MPIG top-up payments brought in to protect practices from losing out when the formula was introduced in 2004.

Around 65% of GMS practices still rely on MPIG top-ups to bring their income up to the level they received before the 2004 contract, meaning their funding does not reflect Carr-Hill weighting.

Significant new funding is unlikely to be available for some time, but politicians and the GPC are keen to phase out the MPIG.

The GPC wants to remove reliance on MPIG by increasing the value of global sum payments.

Plans set out last year in the White Paper Liberating the NHS to move to a single GP contract were 'part of a drive to get rid of MPIG' according to DoH national clinical commissioning network lead for England Dr James Kingsland.

Labour shadow health secretary Andy Burnham told GP recently that the 2004 contract was a 'mistake' because of the MPIG.

Mr Slavin suggested the government may opt to scrap Carr-Hill altogether rather than continue to reform it. He said it was likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula', which could see GPs suffer 'significant' reductions in income, with some practices 'easily losing out on tens of thousands of pounds'.

'It is very unlikely that there would be any winners in this situation. The view at the centre is that GPs are overpaid, so I don't think they would have any qualms in reducing GP income,' Mr Slavin said.

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

GP at Hand should only be allowed to provide NHS 111 services, says BMA

GP at Hand should only be allowed to provide NHS 111 services, says BMA

Babylon GP at Hand should no longer be allowed to register patients and instead be...

A financial guide for GP locums

A financial guide for GP locums

Medical accountant Jenny Stone provides a guide to pensions, setting your fees and...

Paying tax as a GP locum

Paying tax as a GP locum

Medical accountant Jenny Stone explains how you pay your tax as a GP locum.

DNA testing could be part of NHS health checks under government plans

DNA testing could be part of NHS health checks under government plans

The DHSC has launched a review of NHS health checks, with a view to introducing a...

Most GPs now see locum work as most attractive career option, poll reveals

Most GPs now see locum work as most attractive career option, poll reveals

More than half of GPs now believe locum work is the most attractive career option...

Patients in deprived areas find it harder to get GP appointments

Patients in deprived areas find it harder to get GP appointments

Three out of five people living in the most deprived areas in England find it difficult...