Exclusive: Pounds-per-patient may replace UK GMS pay formula

The formula that calculates core pay for GMS practices could be scrapped in favour of a simpler payment per patient under plans to phase out the minimum practice income guarantee (MPIG), accountants believe.

Laurence Slavin: Carr-Hill likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula'

Laurence Slavin, a partner with specialist medical accountants Ramsay Brown and Partners, said the DoH may opt to scrap the formula as part of a move to unify GP contracts.

The GPC and NHS Employers have agreed to review the Carr-Hill formula, which weights core practice funding based on factors including the age and sex of patients, in negotiations over the next year.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey has said discussions on reforming Carr-Hill were left out of this year's contract negotiations.

He said a lack of funding meant that changing the formula would have triggered a redistribution of the MPIG top-up payments brought in to protect practices from losing out when the formula was introduced in 2004.

Around 65% of GMS practices still rely on MPIG top-ups to bring their income up to the level they received before the 2004 contract, meaning their funding does not reflect Carr-Hill weighting.

Significant new funding is unlikely to be available for some time, but politicians and the GPC are keen to phase out the MPIG.

The GPC wants to remove reliance on MPIG by increasing the value of global sum payments.

Plans set out last year in the White Paper Liberating the NHS to move to a single GP contract were 'part of a drive to get rid of MPIG' according to DoH national clinical commissioning network lead for England Dr James Kingsland.

Labour shadow health secretary Andy Burnham told GP recently that the 2004 contract was a 'mistake' because of the MPIG.

Mr Slavin suggested the government may opt to scrap Carr-Hill altogether rather than continue to reform it. He said it was likely to be replaced by a 'standard pounds-per-patient formula', which could see GPs suffer 'significant' reductions in income, with some practices 'easily losing out on tens of thousands of pounds'.

'It is very unlikely that there would be any winners in this situation. The view at the centre is that GPs are overpaid, so I don't think they would have any qualms in reducing GP income,' Mr Slavin said.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Sign pointing to hospital

NHS England seeks to clarify GPs' responsibilities when using advice and guidance

New guidance from NHS England has set out the clinical responsibilities and medicolegal...

Widespread joint pain - red flag symptoms

Presentations and red flag symptoms that may alert you to potentially serious conditions...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Supporting neurodivergent doctors and staff in general practice

Talking General Practice speaks to GPs Dr Beckie Akroyd and Dr Catherine Bell about...

BMA Scotland GP committee chair Dr Andrew Buist

General practice in Scotland 'in serious trouble', warns BMA Scotland GP chair

General practice in Scotland has reached a tipping point, with demand far outstripping...

Hospital entrance

NHS England issues warning over norovirus and rising winter pressures

Almost three times as many people were in hospital with norovirus last week compared...

BMA Northern Ireland GP committee chair Dr Alan Stout

Northern Ireland GPs face deepest-ever crisis as practices hand back contracts

Northern Ireland's GP leader has warned that general practice in the region is facing...