Exclusive: GPs' professionalism at risk as referral scrutiny grows

Schemes that scrutinise GP referrals are growing in number across England and undermine doctors' professionalism, GPs have warned.

A GP survey found 62% of responding GPs agreed that third-party referral management schemes are eroding GPs' professionalism.

One-third (34%) said use of these schemes had increased in their area in the past year.

GPs attacked the practice as 'an appalling waste of time and money' that delayed patient access to care. One respondent said the schemes were 'insulting' for GPs.

This comes ahead of a vote on the matter at the LMCs annual conference in York next week.

Devon LMC will propose a motion calling for a government review of whether referral management centres are value for money.

It will call on GP leaders to recognise 'the lack of any evidence that the additional work, bureaucracy and costs that referral management centres impose on GPs is of any benefit to the efficient functioning of the NHS'.

A third (34%) of 606 GPs in the survey reported an increase in referral assessment in their area in the past 12 months, with just 3% witnessing a fall (see graphic). Some GPs supported referral management, saying the schemes 'raise standards and decrease soft referrals', and 'highlight learning needs of GPs to manage problems more themselves'. Another said there was a 'very efficient' set-up in their area.

Others said they had been put under pressure to refer through their local scheme. One GP partner in England said a local project that started as a 'very useful and helpful referral assessment service' was starting to become a 'referral blocking service'. The scheme amounted to 'arbitrary decisions made by unqualified administrators', said the GP. Others complained the schemes were 'designed to massage waiting list figures'.

One GP partner in England said: 'I thought I was the one trained in medicine to make choices regarding treatment. Apparently not.'

Another GP said: 'After 44 years, I think I know the best person to help my patients.'

A 2013 study in the British Journal of General Practice found referral management at one PCT was more expensive than internal peer review and did not reduce outpatient attendance rates.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said the schemes created 'an unnecessary barrier between GPs and consultants'. He said PCTs implementing such approaches had often later withdrawn them because they were not cost-effective.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Party manifestos offer 'too little too late' on NHS pension tax crisis

Party manifestos offer 'too little too late' on NHS pension tax crisis

Political parties are offering 'too little too late' in their manifestos over the...

GPs report rising workload linked to record hospital waiting times

GPs report rising workload linked to record hospital waiting times

Eight in 10 GPs say rising waits for NHS hospital treatment have driven up workload...

Viewpoint: 'Why the RCGP should not adopt a neutral stance on assisted dying'

Viewpoint: 'Why the RCGP should not adopt a neutral stance on assisted dying'

The RCGP is currently surveying members for their views on assisted dying. In response...

Hurried GP consultations 'a scandal', RCGP chair warns

Hurried GP consultations 'a scandal', RCGP chair warns

Hurried consultations in general practice are 'a scandal that needs to be named'...

GMC labels overseas GP registration 'unfit for purpose' as British doctor denied work

GMC labels overseas GP registration 'unfit for purpose' as British doctor denied work

The GMC has labelled the system for registering overseas doctors as 'unfit for purpose'...

Which parts of England are facing a GP retirement timebomb?

Which parts of England are facing a GP retirement timebomb?

In parts of England more than 40% of the GP workforce in permanent roles is aged...