Exclusive: Czar pledges to limit local QOF variation

DoH consults on changes to quality targets as GPs warn local flexibility could cause postcode lottery.

The vast majority of quality framework indicators will remain UK-wide despite plans for local flexibility, according to the DoH national clinical director for primary care.

Speaking exclusively to GP, Dr David Colin-Thome said proposals to give PCTs greater flexibility to choose indicators would form a minor part of the revised framework.

'The local element will be quite small,' he said. Asked if a figure of around 5 per cent seemed likely, he said local indicators would make up 'a low percentage', of that order.

Proposed changes to the way quality indicators are reviewed were set out in a DoH consultation launched last week.

Under the plans, indicators will be assessed for clinical and cost effectiveness by an expert group appointed by NICE. Primary care organisations or national governments could be handed powers to select indicators from a national menu.

The BMA warned that allowing regional choices of indicators could lead to a postcode lottery in patient care.

The DoH said the quality framework is an incentive scheme, not national standards.

'We are not saying that we want different levels of achievement across PCTs. We want to provide incentives so that outcomes in all PCTs are brought up to the level of the best,' Catherine Jenkins, head of the DoH's quality team, told GP.

The consultation document also outlines plans for a faster turnover of quality indicators. Ten new indicators could be introduced each year, with those that no longer need incentivising 'retired' from the framework.

Each cycle of review is expected to take two years, including eight months to develop and pilot each indicator.

'The pilots will be looking out for unintended consequences of the indicators,' Dr Colin-Thome said. 'We need to get real, practical experience and look at how difficult it would be to introduce a particular indicator.'

Professor Helen Lester, a GP and adviser to the DoH on the quality framework, welcomed the plans. 'Reviewing and retiring indicators is a good idea, but there need to be clear rules on removal and mechanisms to track achievement afterwards,' she said.

Dr Colin-Thome said he expected academic units to bid to conduct reviews. The consultation ends on 2 February 2009.

tom.moberly@haymarket.com

QOF REVIEW
Current indicators
The 88 current indicators to be reviewed at 20-30 a year.
New indicators
NICE will develop 10 new clinical indicators a year.
Funding
NICE will receive £600,000 to oversee the review.
Negotiation
GPC and NHS Employers to decide core UK targets.

Comment below and tell us what you think

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Woman holding face in pain

Should GPs treat patients presenting with dental problems?

The MDU's Dr Kathryn Leask considers what GPs should do if a patient presents with...

Conservative Party leadership candidate and foreign secretary Liz Truss

Liz Truss vows to resolve GP pension tax crisis if she becomes prime minister

Liz Truss has affirmed her commitment to resolving the GP pensions crisis but has...

Baby receiving a vaccine in their thigh

JCVI advises changes to routine childhood and HPV immunisation schedules

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has recommended a change...

GP consultation

General practice delivering 'up to double the appointments it is paid for'

General practice in England may be delivering as many as double the number of appointments...

Sign outside BMA House

GP suicide sparks calls for measures to protect doctors from spiralling workloads

The government and policymakers must do more to safeguard doctors and NHS staff from...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Living with long COVID

In August we’re bringing you some of the best interviews from series one of the podcast....