Editorial: Where is the value in limiting prescriptions?

Science prides itself on being evidence-based. Can you imagine introducing a new drug without rigorous testing?

Last month GP reported that PCTs were introducing 28-day time limits on GP prescriptions to save money (31 October). In practice this meant that GPs were urged to issue prescriptions for no more than 28 days' supply where possible.

The good news in these credit crunch-obsessed times is that there is presumably a cost saving where patients find a 28-day supply will suffice and any additional medicine they would have been given under the old regime is no longer wasted.

But, today GP can reveal that more than 40 per cent of PCTs have introduced 28-day prescribing policies without any assessment of their impact on patient care.

Of 46 PCTs who responded to GP's Freedom of Information request, 45 per cent had introduced guidance for GPs to limit scrips, with just one carrying out any assessment on whether the guidance had affected the number of scrips patients were collecting or the total GPs were issuing.

This is an unquestionable two fingers to the ideal of evidence-based medicine.

Presumably, in an NHS obsessed with consultations and focus groups, patient representatives are happy though? Wrong.

Asthma UK warns that patients will pay more for the same amount of medicine.

Patient Concern says that those with long-term conditions such as asthma face more frequent trips to GPs, potentially deterring them from taking the medication they need.

Buckinghamshire GP Dr Andrew Webber says: 'If there is evidence, we should be able to find it and take a look at it.'

The process of piloting schemes, adopting those that are successful and dropping those that fail is commonplace in the NHS, and it is a far better system for it. Why should we override that procedure in the rush to limit scrips and to save money?

Let's junk all but a few of these schemes and run them as pilots until we can prove that they are of value. Patients deserve nothing less.

More opinion online
Read more opinion from the GP editorial team in the editor's blog at www.healthcarerepublic.com/blogs. This is what the team had to say this week

"Little progress made on PBC When PBC launched, the NHS was in financial deficit. PCTs were trying to claw back funds wherever possible. It's not surprising that GPs were wary about whether they would ever see any of the money they saved."

"COPD overhaul is overdue Staffing in many COPD assessment units remains below the level recommended by the RCP; insufficient information is given to COPD patients; and the provision of palliative care services is highly variable."

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Consultants in London on strike earlier this year

Consultants to vote on new pay deal to end strikes

Consultants will vote on a government pay offer that would increase salaries by up...

BMA England GP committee chair Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer (Photo: Sarah Turton/BMA)

GPs' willingness to take collective action will underpin contract talks

GPs' willingness to take part in 'once in a generation' collective action will underpin...

GP consultation

GPs out of work 'because practices can’t afford to hire them', warns GP leader

Growing numbers of GPs are struggling to find work - with some considering moving...

computer and stethoscope

Petition demanding SCA exam refund collects almost 2,000 signatures

Almost 2,000 people have signed a petition demanding refunds for doctors whose GP...

Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer, chair of the BMA's GP committee in England

Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer: 'The GMS contract is not broken - it has been broken'

BMA England GP committee chair Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer received a standing ovation...

LMC conference sign

LMCs demand formal ballot on outcome of GP contract talks

LMCs have demanded a formal ballot on the outcome of talks over next year's GP contract,...