Editorial - DH must explain how telecare saves £1.2bn

Last month, care services minister Paul Burstow said telecare and telehealth 'could save the NHS up to £1.2bn over five years'.

It would seem common sense that the ability to deploy the latest technology in the NHS would result in both the savings that the £20bn Nicholson challenge demands and the improvement in the quality of patient care that is at the heart of the coalition government's NHS ambitions.

Earlier this year, GP magazine carried a feature about success stories in south London, one of which involved how preventing 24 unnecessary hospital admissions over a year was thought to have saved £55,000 (GP, 11 January).

But, hang on, journalists and GPs thrive on evidence like that costed out for us in south London. Exactly how had the DH calculated its £1.2bn?

GP asked on our readers' behalf and submitted a Freedom of Information Act request when we were blocked. Today we reveal that the DH refused our request, saying it 'could inhibit future policy delivery'. Remember this is the same government that, at the time of writing, has refused to publish the NHS reforms risk register despite direction by an information tribunal to do so (GP, 18 April).

As GP reports this week, telehealth lecturer David Barrett believes the £1.2bn figure is 'potentially' a realistic estimate 'if - and it is a very big "if" - you deploy the right service for the right user in the right way'.

If GPs are to lead clinical commissioning groups effectively to decide how the bulk of the NHS budget is spent, they will need to have the very best evidence at their fingertips to make such decisions.

GP today calls once more on the DH to explain its £1.2bn claim so commissioners can do their job better. Or, if it doesn't feel it can share its analyses with those who have elected ministers, suggests they keep such estimates to themselves.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

GMC tells BMA to name the doctors responsible for bullying and harassment

GMC tells BMA to name the doctors responsible for bullying and harassment

Senior BMA representatives could face investigation over harassment and bullying...

BMA sexism report backs overhaul to boost representation of women

BMA sexism report backs overhaul to boost representation of women

The BMA should use quotas and minimum thresholds for at least the next decade to...

Key recommendations from the BMA sexism investigation

Key recommendations from the BMA sexism investigation

A damning report into sexism at the BMA, conducted by top barrister Daphne Romney...

Medicines export ban widened as drug shortages continue

Medicines export ban widened as drug shortages continue

The government has added four medicines to the list of products wholesalers are banned...

Damning report on BMA sexism condemns 'failure of leadership'

Damning report on BMA sexism condemns 'failure of leadership'

Whistleblowers have spoken of feeling vindicated after a damning report condemned...

Flawed GP consultation data could distort access targets, BMA warns

Flawed GP consultation data could distort access targets, BMA warns

Flawed data on GP consultations could leave practices facing unfair access targets,...