Editorial: Busy practices need fair share of QOF pay

A list of FAQs on the BMA website explains that the QOF is meant to 'resource practices to deliver high quality care to patients by helping them employ the staff they need to offer quality, however many patients there are'.

But GP reports this week that flaws in the system for directing pay to the practices that need it most wiped out prevalence weighting across much of the QOF in 2009/10.

As a result, practices with disease prevalence well above the national average received the same pay per QOF point as practices with almost no prevalence in many disease domains.

The problem has occurred because a mechanism meant to uplift pay for practices with very low prevalence to guarantee them a basic level of QOF income has been distorted by practices reporting abnormally high prevalence. Bizarrely, practice list sizes and disease registers are not counted at the same time for QOF purposes.

Darzi centres with growing patient lists therefore had prevalence rates in some disease areas far in excess of 100 per cent - wiping out prevalence weighting for practices with disease rates in the normal range. In previous years, similar problems have occurred because care homes and a handful of practices that are effectively rooms in hospital wings have been included in the QOF, reporting disease rates above anything a standard practice would have.

Anomalous results like these have made QOF pay weighting unfair for several years.

From 2010/11, pay will be weighted for the first time according to raw prevalence, and the mechanism for supporting low prevalence practices will be removed.

This change will make QOF pay reflect workload more than it currently does. But it's hard to see why the statistical aberrations that have neutered QOF pay weighting year after year have been allowed to continue.

Tackling these may have been a fairer way to improve pay distribution than cutting support for low-prevalence practices, leaving university practices questioning whether they can remain in business.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

COVID-19 death rate highest among BAME groups, delayed PHE review confirms

COVID-19 death rate highest among BAME groups, delayed PHE review confirms

Death rates from COVID-19 are highest among patients from BAME groups, according...

GPs face hundreds of complaints over shielding and PPE during pandemic

GPs face hundreds of complaints over shielding and PPE during pandemic

GP practices have faced hundreds of complaints over issues including shielding and...

More than 3,600 GP partners lost in four years as decline accelerates

More than 3,600 GP partners lost in four years as decline accelerates

The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) GP partners in England fell by 3,636 between...

COVID-19 pandemic leaves 2.4m patients stuck in cancer care backlog

COVID-19 pandemic leaves 2.4m patients stuck in cancer care backlog

Around 2.4m patients are waiting longer for cancer tests or treatment because of...

PHE report delayed on how ethnicity affects COVID-19 outcomes

PHE report delayed on how ethnicity affects COVID-19 outcomes

Public Health England (PHE) has missed its 31 May deadline for reporting on how factors...

Lockdown complacency threatens second COVID-19 spike that could 'overwhelm' NHS

Lockdown complacency threatens second COVID-19 spike that could 'overwhelm' NHS

Complacency around easing coronavirus lockdown measures could trigger a second wave...