Devolution could undermine existing health and social care integration, MPs warn

Devolution of healthcare powers to local authorities must not be allowed to undermine existing NHS efforts to integrate health and social care, MPs have warned.

Local authorities in around 20 parts of England have submitted bids to take control of health under devolution arrangements, according to MPs on the House of Commons communities and local government committee.

But a report by the committee warned that devolution plans 'had arrived at a difficult time' for the NHS, and should not be implemented in areas where it risked undermining existing integration.

The report said: 'Health devolution has arrived at a particularly difficult time for the health and social care system and its staff: there has been significant structural change in recent years and there is now an unprecedented level of financial challenge.

Health devolution

'With such uncertainty, we are concerned about the long-term consequences and recommend that, over an appropriate timescale, the government gathers evidence on the impact of these reforms. It is important that areas should not pursue formal health devolution at the expense of health and social care initiatives with similar aims that are proving fruitful. Areas that do wish to pursue health devolution must have clearly defined objectives for what they expect it to deliver.'

The report broadly accepted the case for devolution in Manchester, but MPs set out concerns that it may not be suitable for other areas.

The report warned that consultation had not been good enough over devolution plans in parts of England, and set out concerns over how pooled budgets would function and be audited. There was a lack of clarity over accountability for services delivered under devolved arrangements, it added.

'There is a need for a clear articulation of how health devolution will work and for clear governance arrangements set out in a way that residents, patients and staff can understand,' the report said. 'This will ensure there is no adverse impact on the quality of local services and that services are accountable. We are not satisfied that there has been sufficient consideration as to how pooled budgets will be regulated and audited and how they will be handled in practice.'

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

GPs demand 'early warning system' as drug shortages drive up workload

GPs demand 'early warning system' as drug shortages drive up workload

GP leaders have demanded an 'early warning system' to flag up medicine supply problems...

GPs need minimum 3.2% pay rise plus plan to reverse cuts, says BMA

GPs need minimum 3.2% pay rise plus plan to reverse cuts, says BMA

Pay for all doctors should rise by a minimum of 3.2% in 2019/20, the BMA has warned...

Solution to GP workforce crisis must come before NHS reform, MPs told

Solution to GP workforce crisis must come before NHS reform, MPs told

The workforce crisis and underfunding of general practice must be tackled before...

Multimorbidity: The gap between guidelines and the reality in practice

Multimorbidity: The gap between guidelines and the reality in practice

Delivering outcome-focused care to patients with comorbidities is increasingly problematic...

Doctors 'severely let down' by pay review body, warns BMA

Doctors 'severely let down' by pay review body, warns BMA

BMA leaders have demanded changes to the review process that sets GP pay, warning...

GP appointments data reveal year-on-year rise in workload

GP appointments data reveal year-on-year rise in workload

GP practices across England delivered nearly 500,000 more appointments in November...