The devil of the White Paper lies in the details

Although I'm passionately in favour of the White Paper, I am also fully aware of its potential problems.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com
The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com

Some are obvious: GPs were trained as doctors, not managers, and many won't want a management role forced upon them. There is a big problem over inherited PCT debt; and uncertainty over the minimum size of consortium needed to minimise financial risks. Individual and corporate skills risk being lost to the NHS as PCTs are wound down - especially if the better managers aren't assured of a job in a consortium.

Other problems are less obvious, but still very damaging.

For example, every practice has to be part of a consortium and any practice failing to join will be allocated to one.

But what about the reverse situation: the consortium which doesn't want to admit a particular practice (whether applying voluntarily or by allocation)? A consortium may have legitimate reasons for refusing, such as a mismatch with local government boundaries; historically separate referral patterns; or difficulties with patient transportation. Will it be able to say no?

Similarly, could a consortium expel poorly-performing practices which can't or won't improve? If not, how can it protect itself against their negative effects? If it is allowed to expel them, what happens to those practices? Will they be forcibly allocated to another (probably unwilling) consortium, in the same way as difficult patients are allocated to other practices?

Alternatively, will a practice expelled from a consortium also automatically lose its contract with the NHS Commissioning Board? If so, its GPs will lose their livelihoods and their practice investment - an effective and suitable threat if the practice is of poor quality. But what is to stop practices in a consortium ganging up to expel an individual practice purely for administrative convenience, envy, or because of personality clashes? If expulsion is to be permitted then complex checks and balances will be needed to ensure fairness, plus an appeals process - all cumbersome and expensive.

These scenarios aren't hypothetical: they are bound to occur. Huge problems lie ahead if the regulations aren't crafted very carefully. The devil will be in the detail.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

England's £20,000 golden hello scheme could poach GP partners from other UK countries

England's £20,000 golden hello scheme could poach GP partners from other UK countries

GPs partners in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland could be poached by the English...

Viewpoint: How GPs can build a more equal post-COVID world through health creation

Viewpoint: How GPs can build a more equal post-COVID world through health creation

Former NHS chief executive Lord Nigel Crisp explains why the UK needs to focus on...

Mandatory face covering in GP practices vital as face-to-face contacts rise, warns BMA

Mandatory face covering in GP practices vital as face-to-face contacts rise, warns BMA

Face coverings should be mandatory for patients visiting GP practices amid a rapid...

Workshops to help overseas doctors adapt to NHS go online as GMC reacts to pandemic

Workshops to help overseas doctors adapt to NHS go online as GMC reacts to pandemic

Free GMC workshops to help overseas doctors adjust to working in the UK are being...

How new technology can help GPs manage ENT patients

How new technology can help GPs manage ENT patients

Dr Marcelino Ruiz-Martin and Dr Ruth Chambers explain how a practice in Staffordshire...

Face-to-face GP consultations up 70% since start of lockdown

Face-to-face GP consultations up 70% since start of lockdown

Face-to-face GP consultations have risen 70% compared with the early stages of lockdown,...