The devil of the White Paper lies in the details

Although I'm passionately in favour of the White Paper, I am also fully aware of its potential problems.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com
The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com

Some are obvious: GPs were trained as doctors, not managers, and many won't want a management role forced upon them. There is a big problem over inherited PCT debt; and uncertainty over the minimum size of consortium needed to minimise financial risks. Individual and corporate skills risk being lost to the NHS as PCTs are wound down - especially if the better managers aren't assured of a job in a consortium.

Other problems are less obvious, but still very damaging.

For example, every practice has to be part of a consortium and any practice failing to join will be allocated to one.

But what about the reverse situation: the consortium which doesn't want to admit a particular practice (whether applying voluntarily or by allocation)? A consortium may have legitimate reasons for refusing, such as a mismatch with local government boundaries; historically separate referral patterns; or difficulties with patient transportation. Will it be able to say no?

Similarly, could a consortium expel poorly-performing practices which can't or won't improve? If not, how can it protect itself against their negative effects? If it is allowed to expel them, what happens to those practices? Will they be forcibly allocated to another (probably unwilling) consortium, in the same way as difficult patients are allocated to other practices?

Alternatively, will a practice expelled from a consortium also automatically lose its contract with the NHS Commissioning Board? If so, its GPs will lose their livelihoods and their practice investment - an effective and suitable threat if the practice is of poor quality. But what is to stop practices in a consortium ganging up to expel an individual practice purely for administrative convenience, envy, or because of personality clashes? If expulsion is to be permitted then complex checks and balances will be needed to ensure fairness, plus an appeals process - all cumbersome and expensive.

These scenarios aren't hypothetical: they are bound to occur. Huge problems lie ahead if the regulations aren't crafted very carefully. The devil will be in the detail.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Government outlines PPE supply plans as GPs remain in dark over reimbursement

Government outlines PPE supply plans as GPs remain in dark over reimbursement

The government has outlined plans to provide 'an uninterrupted supply' of PPE during...

Four in five GPs report heavy workload as COVID-19 second wave builds

Four in five GPs report heavy workload as COVID-19 second wave builds

Four in five GPs say their practice is currently facing levels of workload that are...

Medeconomics Live: Bringing you the latest in practice management thinking

Medeconomics Live: Bringing you the latest in practice management thinking

The one-day, virtual Medeconomics Live conference aims to provide essential insights...

First COVID-19 jabs to target care home residents and staff under new JCVI advice

First COVID-19 jabs to target care home residents and staff under new JCVI advice

Older adults living in care homes and staff working there will be first to receive...

GPs unable to veto virtual fitness to practise hearings during pandemic

GPs unable to veto virtual fitness to practise hearings during pandemic

GPs facing fitness to practise investigations during the COVID-19 pandemic will be...

Government rejects major NHSPS overhaul - but changes 'could ease GP service charge disputes'

Government rejects major NHSPS overhaul - but changes 'could ease GP service charge disputes'

A government review has rejected calls for a major overhaul of an NHS Property Services...