CQC to investigate impact of GP at Hand on traditional practices

The CQC will investigate how services like Babylon's GP at Hand are affecting traditional GP practices and the quality of care they provide.

Professor Steve Field

Giving evidence to the House of Commons health and social care committee on Tuesday, CQC chief inspector for general practice Professor Steve Field said the watchdog would be ‘looking at the surgeries that might be impacted’ by online providers.

His comments came after committee chair and former GP Dr Sarah Wollaston highlighted concerns that ‘rapidly emerging’ online consulting systems ‘like Babylon and GP at Hand’ may ‘have a destabilising effect on the wider system’.

Patients who register with GP at Hand - which has attracted more than 30,000 predominantly young patients over the past year - are required to quit their existing practice and sign up as out-of-area patients with the service’s host practice in south-west London.

Cherry picking

The service limits registrations from patients likely to have complex needs, which has led to accusations of ‘cherry picking’ - and concern that the model could destabilise traditional practices, which rely on funding for younger patients to cover some of the cost of providing care for complex older patients.

Dr Wollaston asked Professor Field whether the CQC was ‘looking not just at that individual alternative model but [at] the effect it could have on those models around it’.

He replied: ‘The problem we have as the CQC is that we are an independent and strong regulator but we do not do the commissioning - [we] have no responsibility for the commissioning and the contracting.

‘So we are observers of services that perhaps have started recently in London. If you’re alluding to the impact on other patients there, so we can observe that and we will actually be looking at the surgeries that might be impacted and the quality of care that they provide.’


Despite a ‘high profile case at the moment which might be having an effect on patients in their locality’, Professor Field told MPs many other ‘under the radar’ systems offered ‘a brilliant service’ to patients.

On the whole, Professor Field said he was ‘optimistic’ about the emergence of online providers in general practice.

‘I support the introduction of these alternative methods of consulting because it could save time for clinicians and certainly will save time for patients who want to use those services,’ he said. ‘But they do have to be safe and effective just like traditional face-to-face consulting.’

Health and social care secretary Matt Hancock has been criticised for endorsing a national rollout of GP at Hand, which he said should made ‘available to all, not based on postcode’.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Andrea Leadsom

DHSC confirms new minister responsible for general practice

Andrea Leadsom has been confirmed as the new DHSC minister for primary care and general...


Government must match consultants' pay offer in new contract for GPs

GPs have warned they could be forced into industrial action if the government fails...

Consultants in London on strike earlier this year

Consultants to vote on new pay deal to end strikes

Consultants will vote on a government pay offer that would increase salaries by up...

BMA England GP committee chair Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer (Photo: Sarah Turton/BMA)

GPs' willingness to take collective action will underpin contract talks

GPs' willingness to take part in 'once in a generation' collective action will underpin...

GP consultation

GPs out of work 'because practices can’t afford to hire them', warns GP leader

Growing numbers of GPs are struggling to find work - with some considering moving...

computer and stethoscope

Petition demanding SCA exam refund collects almost 2,000 signatures

Almost 2,000 people have signed a petition demanding refunds for doctors whose GP...