CQC inspection plans 'must not drive up GP costs'

Practices must not be burdened with extra costs under plans for healthcare watchdog the CQC to create 'larger, more expert' inspection teams, GP leaders have warned.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul: assessment by social media 'unscientific'
Dr Chaand Nagpaul: assessment by social media 'unscientific'

The GPC also hit out at plans to use social media including Facebook and Twitter to assess practice performance.

A strategy document published by the CQC set out plans for bigger inspection teams with more specialist knowledge, and confirms that assessments of care will give ‘an organisation rating’.

It says that ‘inspectors will specialise in particular areas of care and will lead teams that include clinical and other experts and people with experience of care who we call experts by experience’.

In some cases the watchdog will go beyond checks on individual providers to carry out ‘in-depth investigations to look at system-wide concerns’, the report says.

‘For example, we may investigate system-wide issues relating to the care that people with dementia receive,’ it says.

The strategy document says results of friends and family tests – due to be introduced first for hospitals and later for primary care – and social media comments will be taken into account in assessing providers.

‘We will search for both positive and negative comments on what is being said about services, including using social media (for example, Facebook and Twitter) and other digital media such as our website,’ the CQC report says.

GPC negotiator Dr Chaand Nagpaul warned against forcing practices to take on extra costs or excessive regulation.

He pointed out that practices in England were being disadvantaged compared with those in the rest of the UK, which will not face CQC checks or fees.

‘GPs are already feeling overburdened with increasing workload, expenses and a reduction in income,’ he added.

Dr Nagpaul welcomed CQC plans to focus inspections increasingly where risk is seen to be highest.

But he added that it was ‘highly unscientific and unfair’ to judge the quality of a service by social media or other online comments.

‘We already have feedback via the patient survey, and on quality of care via QOF achievement. Relying on social media is selective feedback and it would be inappropriate to make judgements on practices based on what is said on social media,’ he argued.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Deadline missed for PHE report on how ethnicity affects COVID-19 outcomes

Deadline missed for PHE report on how ethnicity affects COVID-19 outcomes

Public Health England (PHE) has missed its 31 May deadline for reporting on how factors...

Lockdown complacency threatens second COVID-19 spike that could 'overwhelm' NHS

Lockdown complacency threatens second COVID-19 spike that could 'overwhelm' NHS

Complacency around easing coronavirus lockdown measures could trigger a second wave...

Practices asked to 'proactively address' unmet health needs during pandemic

Practices asked to 'proactively address' unmet health needs during pandemic

GP practices in England have been told to assess where care has been delayed during...

Hertfordshire GP trainee Dr Abdorreza Sedghi dies from COVID-19

Hertfordshire GP trainee Dr Abdorreza Sedghi dies from COVID-19

A GP trainee working in Hertfordshire who has been praised for his ‘charisma and...

GP anger as shielding advice changed 'without warning'

GP anger as shielding advice changed 'without warning'

GPs have hit out at a lack of warning over changes to advice for patients on shielding...

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

Coronavirus: Key guidance GPs need to know about COVID-19

GPonline provides an overview of the key guidance relating to coronavirus, including...