IT competence is key to patient safety

I have just heard to my horror that the DoH is planning to abandon its requirement for practices to demonstrate IT competence before being allowed to upload electronic summaries to the spine.

Instead of passing the Information Management and Technology Directed Enhanced Service (IM&T DES), practices will merely have to acquire paperless accreditation, which needs no demonstrated competence.

With no need for practices to demonstrate the soundness of their electronic recording, the DoH will then claim that the vast majority of practices are ready to send patient summaries to the spine - and so justify Connecting for Health and its wasted billions. Yet abandoning these important standards will put patients' lives at risk. In their absence, large numbers of incomplete or inaccurate summaries will be uploaded.

This situation is ridiculous and unsafe. Although the UK is a world leader in medical software, it doesn't necessarily follow that users will use IT properly or consistently.

There is still no formal training in the use and upkeep of the computerised medical record. Indeed, many clinicians imagine that simply writing down their findings, with a suitable Read code attached, is sufficient. It is not - particularly where just a summary of the record is shared.

How many summaries miss important items, or are full of trivia? How many depend for their completeness on free text - which won't be uploaded? How many omit substantive diagnosis, yet include procedural entries such as 'Diabetic monitoring'?

Does current medication include all hospital-prescribed or community-given drugs? Are discontinued drugs removed immediately? Are sensitivities up to date and recorded in a manner fit for sharing?

Housekeeping the medical record is a skill which has both to be acquired and practised - which is why IM&T DES accreditation is genuinely important. In its absence, how can any doctor trust a spine summary? Medico-legally, who will take the blame when a doctor relies on a summary that proves dangerously inaccurate or out of date?

Dumbing down IT standards appears to be a cynical ploy to make the DoH look good in the electorate's eyes - while at the same time putting their health at risk.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Hospitals adding to GP crisis with constant flow of work dumped on practices, say LMCs

Hospitals adding to GP crisis with constant flow of work dumped on practices, say LMCs

Hospitals are compounding the GP workload crisis by dumping 'endless tasks' on primary...

Abnormal vaginal discharge - red flag symptoms

Abnormal vaginal discharge - red flag symptoms

Advice on red flag symptoms in patients with vaginal discharge, including what examinations...

GMC demands 'greater autonomy' to tackle bias against BAME doctors

GMC demands 'greater autonomy' to tackle bias against BAME doctors

The GMC has called for ‘greater autonomy’ to choose the complaints it investigates,...

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...

Government must invest to end 'historic' GP crisis in wake of COVID-19, says BMA

Government must invest to end 'historic' GP crisis in wake of COVID-19, says BMA

General practice is facing 'historic workforce and workload crises' that have been...

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

Most GP care should be face-to-face post-COVID, says RCGP

General practice faces a 'rebalancing' between face-to-face and remote consultations...