IT competence is key to patient safety

I have just heard to my horror that the DoH is planning to abandon its requirement for practices to demonstrate IT competence before being allowed to upload electronic summaries to the spine.

Instead of passing the Information Management and Technology Directed Enhanced Service (IM&T DES), practices will merely have to acquire paperless accreditation, which needs no demonstrated competence.

With no need for practices to demonstrate the soundness of their electronic recording, the DoH will then claim that the vast majority of practices are ready to send patient summaries to the spine - and so justify Connecting for Health and its wasted billions. Yet abandoning these important standards will put patients' lives at risk. In their absence, large numbers of incomplete or inaccurate summaries will be uploaded.

This situation is ridiculous and unsafe. Although the UK is a world leader in medical software, it doesn't necessarily follow that users will use IT properly or consistently.

There is still no formal training in the use and upkeep of the computerised medical record. Indeed, many clinicians imagine that simply writing down their findings, with a suitable Read code attached, is sufficient. It is not - particularly where just a summary of the record is shared.

How many summaries miss important items, or are full of trivia? How many depend for their completeness on free text - which won't be uploaded? How many omit substantive diagnosis, yet include procedural entries such as 'Diabetic monitoring'?

Does current medication include all hospital-prescribed or community-given drugs? Are discontinued drugs removed immediately? Are sensitivities up to date and recorded in a manner fit for sharing?

Housekeeping the medical record is a skill which has both to be acquired and practised - which is why IM&T DES accreditation is genuinely important. In its absence, how can any doctor trust a spine summary? Medico-legally, who will take the blame when a doctor relies on a summary that proves dangerously inaccurate or out of date?

Dumbing down IT standards appears to be a cynical ploy to make the DoH look good in the electorate's eyes - while at the same time putting their health at risk.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

A meeting with one person on a video conference screen

Improving learning log entries in GP training: a reflection on leadership

Dr Prashini Naidoo looks at a typical e-portfolio learning log entry (LLE) and discusses...

Whitehall street sign

NHS officials doubled in two years as GP workforce dropped

Staff employed by NHS England and the DHSC doubled in two years from the start of...

Child coughing

NICE traffic light tool that helps GPs spot seriously ill under-5s 'unreliable'

NICE's 'traffic light' system - intended to help GPs identify risk of serious illness...

Pregnant woman receives COVID-19 vaccine

COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women rising but stark inequality remains

More than half of pregnant women are now double vaccinated against COVID-19 as uptake...

Vaccination tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK have led the largest-ever NHS vaccination programme in response...

GMC sign

Overseas-graduate GPs fare worse in medical tribunals due to lack of legal help

UK GPs who graduated overseas face worse outcomes in GMC cases because they are far...