Chris Lancelot: Why exception reporting in QOF is essential

The DoH is considering scrapping QOF exception reporting, following a report suggesting that some gaming has taken place, including one case of outright fraud.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com
The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com

Clearly, the gaming of QOF targets is unethical. But to use this evidence to justify the removal of exception coding altogether is both illogical and vindictive.

As we all know, real medicine is 'fuzzy'. Diagnoses aren't always clear-cut; nor is treatment. Crucially, imposing simplistic targets does not make this fuzziness go away: QOF targets are often arbitrary or rounded values. (Why should BP in diabetes have to be 145/85 or lower? Why not 144/86?)

This fuzziness also includes medication. We all know patients whose BP can't be reduced without fainting or falls occurring. Similarly, patients may have an excellent clinical response to lithium despite having less than the recommended blood levels. Then there is patient suitability - for example, those dying of cancer, for whom fasting blood tests for cholesterol are inappropriate; or residents in elderly mentally infirm units whose co-operation with blood tests or medication is minimal.

Lastly, there is patient choice. Why should a practice be penalised if it cares for those who choose not to be immunised, or won't look after their diabetes? Good clinical medicine deals with all these issues - often by a deliberate, clinical decision not to treat, or else to treat to a different target. It is clearly wrong to penalise GPs who conscientiously work in this way.

Unfortunately, certain managers think exception coding is how practices evade criticism of their clinical care. Some PCTs even give a red rating on their practice scorecards for higher levels of exception coding. How simplistic. Which practice gives better care - one that gets 70 per cent of patients to target, but doesn't bother with the rest; or the practice that sees all of them, gets 70 per cent to target and correctly excepts the other 30 per cent?

Just because some GPs may have gamed QOF targets doesn't mean the rest of us should be penalised. If gaming is occurring then the DoH needs to attack the gaming, not the exception coding itself.

In the fuzzy world of medicine, if practices are to be remunerated for hitting targets then exception reporting is essential.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

GMC defers revalidation for a further 9,000 doctors due to pandemic

GMC defers revalidation for a further 9,000 doctors due to pandemic

Around 9,000 doctors who are due to revalidate between March and July 2021 will have...

NHS England praises GPs after steep rise in general practice appointments

NHS England praises GPs after steep rise in general practice appointments

NHS England primary care medical director Dr Nikki Kanani has thanked GPs and their...

Half of GPs say patients harmed by delays to care during COVID-19 pandemic

Half of GPs say patients harmed by delays to care during COVID-19 pandemic

Nearly half of GPs say patients on their list have come to harm because of delays...

Viewpoint: Test and trace isn't working - could GPs do it better?

Viewpoint: Test and trace isn't working - could GPs do it better?

The outsourced test and trace system isn't working, says Dr Simon Hodes. It's time...

Doctors call for test and trace millions to be diverted to primary care and local NHS

Doctors call for test and trace millions to be diverted to primary care and local NHS

Doctors have urged the government to divert hundreds of millions of pounds from the...

Hundreds of GPs a month seek mental health support as COVID-19 pressure bites

Hundreds of GPs a month seek mental health support as COVID-19 pressure bites

More than 200 GPs a month are seeking mental health support as COVID-19 drives up...