Chris Lancelot: Standards must be worth setting and keeping

As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, the DoH is considering abandoning its requirement to achieve information management and technology directed enhanced service accreditation before uploading patient summaries to the spine. Not only is this potentially dangerous but it is a slap in the face for those GPs who spent time and effort completing the training.

Indeed, it calls into question the whole matter of standards in the NHS. Obviously, we must have standards - but standards need to be appropriate, consistently applied, maintained and predictable.

Standards must be appropriate: it is not appropriate to ask highly qualified doctors to produce further certificates attesting to their abilities in subjects already covered in their training (minor surgery, immunisations, child development, etc.) Vocational training and/or MRCGP should be sufficient.

We are professionals, and should be trusted to keep ourselves fully up to date.

What about revalidation? As currently planned, this is heavy-handed, mostly unnecessary, time-consuming and intrusive. It would be much better if revalidation were automatic, with formal investigation confined to that small percentage whose behaviour was already causing concern.

Standards must be consistently applied: if doctors and nurses have to keep to standards, so must managers. Half the NHS workforce cannot continually be under scrutiny while the other half is largely unregulated.

Standards must be maintained: they should not be set, only to be abandoned for political convenience. Arbitrary introduction or removal of standards implies they are only of use to manipulate staff.

Finally, standards need to be predictable, not changed surreptitiously. There was a time when vocational training was more than sufficient qualification for a lifetime as a GP. Then, without formal announcement, MRCGP started to creep in as an additional requirement, not just for registrars, but for employment in the Darzi clinics.

'Diploma creep' is bad news for doctors, especially when introduced without formal discussion or considerable prior warning. At all stages of their careers, doctors should be fully aware of exactly what qualifications will or will not be required in 10 years' time.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Professor Dame Clare Gerada elected RCGP president

Professor Dame Clare Gerada elected RCGP president

London GP Professor Dame Clare Gerada will become the new president of the RCGP,...

GPs lead COVID-19 vaccine drive as jabs stall in younger adults

GPs lead COVID-19 vaccine drive as jabs stall in younger adults

GPs have urged young people to come forward for COVID-19 vaccination with jab uptake...

GPs leading PCNs report heavy workload and limited impact from ARRS

GPs leading PCNs report heavy workload and limited impact from ARRS

PCN clinical directors are facing burnout and struggling to develop their networks...

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK are playing a leading role in the largest-ever NHS vaccination...

RCGP online exhibition celebrates women in general practice

RCGP online exhibition celebrates women in general practice

An online exhibition celebrating women’s contribution to general practice over the...

MPs back campaign against reforms that 'threaten fairness of fitness to practise cases'

MPs back campaign against reforms that 'threaten fairness of fitness to practise cases'

Plans to scrap the 'five-year rule' and categorise doctors with health concerns as...