Chris Lancelot: Public and private - not a case of good and bad

I do wish people would think more deeply. Many have been brainwashed into believing that, in healthcare, 'NHS' means 'good' and 'private' implies 'bad', 'selfish' or 'profiteering'. Even doctors who rightly believe in evidence-based medicine appear to have swallowed this assumption whole.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com
The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com

There is a myth abroad of 'the noble NHS doctor' and 'the dedicated nurse', working for nothing but the good of their patients. Applied to such people 'profit' is clearly a dirty word, which sullies their heroic status.

And it's all a fairy story. We all work for profit - because we've all got to eat. Whether we work for the NHS, for a private company, or as independent contractors, we all work to make money. But aren't private companies a drain on the public purse, set up to make a profit from the taxpayer? Don't they waste money by comparison with the NHS?

Not necessarily. As the economist Milton Friedman has pointed out, when spending money, the less directly we are involved the less care we take. If we spend our own money on ourselves we take great trouble to purchase exactly the right thing at the right price. When spending our own money on a friend (say, for a present) we usually spend less time choosing. And if we spend someone else's money on a third party, our level of concern diminishes even further.

Public organisations fall into Friedman's third category. Their individual managers don't benefit from spending public resources carefully. Instead, their only possible gain is to their ego: the one who can create the biggest empire or hold the largest budget wins. No wonder large public ventures frequently overspend and underperform.

This is why the central NHS is so frequently overmanaged, overspent and inefficient. Conversely, it's also why primary care has long been recognised as the most efficient area of the NHS - because as independent contractors we benefit personally and financially when we deliver more care, more cost-effectively.

'Public' may mean 'non-profit-making' - but it can also mean 'inefficient' and 'wasteful'. Indeed, in some areas of healthcare 'private' may be a more economical user of resources than 'public' ever was. This is where the mantra of 'public is good, private is bad' disintegrates.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Subject access requests to GP practices increased by a third under GDPR

Subject access requests to GP practices increased by a third under GDPR

The number of subject access requests (SARs) GP practices receive each month has...

RCGP criticises GP at Hand video showing antibiotics prescribed for sore throat

RCGP criticises GP at Hand video showing antibiotics prescribed for sore throat

A promotional video for Babylon GP at Hand that shows a patient with a sore throat...

Review into overprescribing aims to give GPs power to challenge hospital scrips

Review into overprescribing aims to give GPs power to challenge hospital scrips

A government review of overprescribing in the NHS could see GPs given more power...

Submit your session ideas for the RCGP Annual Conference 2019

Submit your session ideas for the RCGP Annual Conference 2019

GPs can now submit ideas for sessions at the RCGP Annual Conference in Liverpool,...

Scottish GP workforce increases for first time in 10 years, figures show

Scottish GP workforce increases for first time in 10 years, figures show

GP numbers in Scotland have risen slightly for the first time in 10 years despite...

More than 16m GP practice appointments a year lost to DNAs

More than 16m GP practice appointments a year lost to DNAs

More than 16m appointments at GP practices are lost every year because patients fail...