Chris Lancelot on ... Practice-Based Commissioning

How is practice-based commissioning (PBC) doing in your area?

Are you ahead of the game? Our group has met frequently, taking up many hours of medical time. Consequently it has paid large amounts in expenses to doctors and practice managers.

And of course we've got a lot of statistics - in fact, we're drowning in them. During most weeks I receive two or three emails from our PBC manager, each with multiple attachments of densely typed spreadsheets and pretty coloured graphs. My practice manager is drowning in paperwork and statistics (all of which need intensive checking) and is quietly losing the will to live.

But doesn't it look impressive? Don't you get the feeling that we are running the health service - in charge at last, doing the right thing? Actually, no. NHS data are simply not dependable. Although the NHS collects vast amounts of detailed information it has ignored the first rule of statistics, which is that data have to be consistently accurate before any conclusions can be drawn from them.

And the data are anything but acceptable. Our practice's listed hospital activity includes large numbers of patients who aren't ours. Other patients have been double-counted; or incorrectly logged as having undergone procedures which were never performed; or recorded as being admitted for far longer than they actually were in hospital. This immediately begs the question: even if we do manage to reduce our referrals under PBC, how are we going to prove it if the statistics are so unreliable?

I doubt whether our PBC group will actually achieve any savings: so far all we seem to do is endlessly discuss protocols without getting anything practical done. In all the time we have spent working on PBC hardly anything has been put in place that improves patient care or delivers it more economically. All we get are increasingly strident calls to refer less, as each day we go a little bit more into the red.

PBC is delivering everything I predicted and nothing that the politicians desired. It is a waste of time, money and effort: it introduces yet another layer of officialdom; but worst of all, the huge amount of time it absorbs takes highly qualified GPs away from their real job of patient care.

However, it does produce some nice graphs: and all in bright colours, too.

Dr Lancelot is a GP from Lancashire. Email him at GPcolumnists@haymarket.com .

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Medical examiners to scrutinise deaths in community settings

The MDU's Dr Kathryn Leask explains how the expansion of the medical examiner system...

Person receiving a COVID-19 booster

COVID-19 booster campaign to start on 5 September, NHS England says

The COVID-19 booster programme will begin in care homes and for housebound patients...

GP consulting room

Nine in ten GPs fear their practice will struggle to cope this winter

Nearly nine in ten GPs fear that their practice will struggle to cope this winter,...

BMA sign

BMA elects new deputy chair of England GP committee and chair of Scottish council

Dr David Wrigley has been elected as new deputy chair of the BMA's GP committee in...

UK money

Almost half of practices say income from private fees has fallen in past year

Almost half of GP practices have seen their income from private and professional...

COVID-19 vaccination centre

BMA raises 'serious concerns' about GP workload and funding for autumn COVID boosters

The BMA has raised 'serious concerns' about the workload implications of this autumn's...