Chris Lancelot on...the need for the personal

Words are important. They convey messages — in a precise and unambiguous manner, it is to be hoped. This is particularly important in medical communications where it is essential to leave no room for doubt.

Unfortunately — and rather surprisingly — the ‘scientific’ way in which we are taught to write carries within it the seeds of imprecision. I remember vividly the first school chemistry experiment I wrote up. I described it in the active voice: ‘We dissolved the copper sulphate crystals in some water…’, only to have my knuckles rapped. The correct form, I was forcefully told, was to use the passive: ‘Copper sulphate crystals were dissolved in water…’

From then on we all learned to write like that. Taking the first person out of the report makes it look and feel truly scientific — and somewhat dull, too.

But writing in the passive voice or the third person isn’t helpful in medical communications, because it loses the sense of whose job it is to do the work. ‘This patient needs a chest X-ray...’ writes the consultant. Good. Just one problem: is she saying she has ordered it or is she asking the GP to do it?

I could not count the times this has caused difficulties in our practice. ‘He will need a repeat of his thyroid function tests two weeks before the next outpatient attendance…’ (Yes, doctor — have you written out the form or is it up to me?). Or most hazardous of all, because of the implications if it’s not done properly: ‘This patient needs referring to the cardiology department…’ On each occasion my secretaries have to ring up to ask who is supposed to be doing what, because there is no obvious answer.

How refreshing when the penny drops and hospital doctors start writing in the first person again: ‘I’ve ordered a chest X-ray and the necessary blood tests, but please would you refer him to the cardiology department?’ Now that’s totally unambiguous. It may sound ‘unscientific’, but the message is clear — and clarity of communication is what medical correspondence is all about.

How many lives have been lost, I wonder, because an all-important test or referral wasn’t performed, each practitioner thinking the other was requesting it?

So let’s put the first person back into medical communications, shall we? It may sound less scientific — but it is a great deal safer.

- Dr Lancelot is a GP from Lancashire. Email him at GPcolumnists@haymarket.com

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

The healthcare crisis in Myanmar - how UK GPs can help

The healthcare crisis in Myanmar - how UK GPs can help

Dr Jim Brockbank from Myanmar UK GP Health Action provides an update on how the military...

GPs warn of 'open floodgates' as 84% say e-consultations have driven up workload

GPs warn of 'open floodgates' as 84% say e-consultations have driven up workload

More than four fifths of GPs say e-consultation systems adopted in the pandemic have...

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Map: Which CCGs have the highest COVID-19 vaccine coverage?

Tens of millions of COVID-19 jabs have been administered across England, but how...

Podcast: Greener practice, sharing patient data and additional roles

Podcast: Greener practice, sharing patient data and additional roles

In this episode we look at data extraction from GP records, ask whether the additional...

Red flag symptoms: Loss of consciousness

Red flag symptoms: Loss of consciousness

Red flag symptoms to look out for in presentations of loss of consciousness, including...

£20m fund to speed up second jabs as CCGs told to limit pressure on practices

£20m fund to speed up second jabs as CCGs told to limit pressure on practices

NHS England has announced £20m in funding to help local COVID-19 vaccination sites...