Chris Lancelot on... Regulating primary care

There's going to be a new Care Quality Commission to regulate primary care.

The government wants it to inspect practices and publish details of individual GPs' performances, with tough new sanctions for poor-quality practitioners who fail to improve.

Leading figures at the Healthcare Commission have been concerned about primary care standards for some time. They believe that regulating GPs is a top priority and claim that nationwide we make hundreds of mistakes every day, with prescribing errors occurring in one in 10 consultations.

Do you feel threatened by all this? I don't. What an opportunity for general practice. For years we GPs have been accused of being lazy, overpaid and incompetent.

Indeed, not four years ago the DoH had such a low opinion of our abilities that it predicted our average score in the quality framework would be a mere 770 (and we all know what happened next).

Of course there are some black sheep among us: every profession has them. But the majority of us know our stuff. We work hard looking after our patients, and it's time the world (and especially the government) realised just how competent we are.

So I welcome the opportunity to show the Care Quality Commission's inspectors just how good primary care is.

I shall enjoy telling them about our practice's consistently high quality score and of our excellent access times. Perhaps those same investigators will take on board the lack of expenditure by the PCT on our buildings, the poor-quality hospital statistics with which we have to work and the huge amounts of medical time we waste attending PCT and practice-based commissioning meetings.

Then we could talk about the understaffed and lopsided district nurse teams, with too many managers and not enough workers. We could remind the inspectors of the constant attempts to dump more work on us, of the health service managers who get in our way rather than smooth our path and of their intrusive requests for ever more data.

We can discuss the inadequacies of the Choose and Book software that we are forced to use, the large amounts of GP time that it wastes and the ridiculous and unprofessional referral processes that are being inflicted upon us.

Yes, I welcome a thorough assessment of primary care.

Dr Lancelot is a GP from Lancashire. Email him at GPcolumnists@haymarket.com

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Practices handed one-month opt-out window as revamped network DES unveiled

Practices handed one-month opt-out window as revamped network DES unveiled

NHS England has unveiled a revamped DES package for 2020/21 confirming new targets,...

GPs delivered huge rise in face-to-face consultations in week before NHS England letter

GPs delivered huge rise in face-to-face consultations in week before NHS England letter

GPs delivered a huge increase in face-to-face appointments in the week before NHS...

RCGP facing legal action over stance on assisted dying

RCGP facing legal action over stance on assisted dying

The RCGP is facing legal action over its decision to remain opposed to assisted dying...

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

The one-day, virtual Medeconomics Live conference aims to provide practices with...

GPs face wave of abuse and complaints after NHS England face-to-face appointments claims

GPs face wave of abuse and complaints after NHS England face-to-face appointments claims

GP practices have faced a wave of abuse and complaints after a letter from NHS England...

Government denies plan to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of COVID-19 testing

Government denies plan to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of COVID-19 testing

The government has denied plans to make GPs 'gatekeepers' of the struggling COVID-19...