Chris Lancelot on... ensuring revalidation is right

I have no problem with the principle of revalidation: it is patently obvious that the nation needs to ensure its doctors are competent. But can revalidation be carried out accurately? It's not as simple as you might think.

For example, I have no worries about the operational side of our practice. We hit most targets and score well in patient surveys. But knowledge testing is a different matter.  

How would a knowledge test be performed? Many GPs over 50 have never taken a multiple-choice paper. Judging by the numbers considering retiring if asked to undergo revalidation, I suspect this is a widespread and valid concern.  

What is to be tested? The origin, insertion and innervation of sartorius? The microscopic findings in Hirschsprung’s disease? Knowledge testing is more difficult in primary care than the specialties, because of the vast array of subjects we cover. There is no way I can remember everything: but when faced with something I don’t know, or may not be up to date on, I have a foolproof remedy — I look it up. How do we test for that?  

Crucially, much GP medicine is currently devolved to other health professionals. Asthma was once one of my specialisms: I’m almost de-skilled now, because my nurses run the clinics.  

Finally, practices are surprisingly different. GPs in the affluent suburbs will seldom see chronic schizophrenia; rural GPs may have few ethnic patients; some practices have little or no HIV. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ GP knowledge exam — with questions on how to treat hypertension in an Afro-Caribbean, the next step in the control of a particular diabetic, or how to section a patient when no social worker is available — will not necessarily be an appropriate test of the individual GP in their current practice.  

Designing a knowledge exam to revalidate all GPs fairly will be a nightmare. It has to test adequately, yet not discriminate against GPs who for legitimate reasons have become deskilled in certain areas. The DoH will first have to validate revalidation, to ensure that it really does identify solely the poor performers. A doctor must fail revalidation, rather than the revalidation process failing the doctor.  

Dr Lancelot is a GP from Lancashire.

Email him at GPcolumnists@haymarket.com
 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Medico-legal: Intimate examinations and chaperones during COVID-19

Medico-legal: Intimate examinations and chaperones during COVID-19

Remote consultations are likely to be a key part of general practice for months to...

NHS England promises detail on additional flu funding ‘by end of August’

NHS England promises detail on additional flu funding ‘by end of August’

GPs may have to wait until the end of August to find out details of any additional...

Why 63% of GPs expect to do more home-working after COVID-19

Why 63% of GPs expect to do more home-working after COVID-19

Working from home was one of the key issues raised in GPonline's survey of more than...

Lack of support during the menopause leading female doctors to quit

Lack of support during the menopause leading female doctors to quit

A lack of support during the menopause has led some female doctors to consider reducing...

One in three single-handed GPs at high-risk from COVID-19

One in three single-handed GPs at high-risk from COVID-19

A third of single-handed GPs are at high-risk from COVID-19, which could potentially...

Viewpoint: PCNs can be at the forefront of tackling health inequalities

Viewpoint: PCNs can be at the forefront of tackling health inequalities

Dr Mark Spencer explains how the COVID-19 pandemic helped his primary care network...