Chris Lancelot - Misleading targets will send practices off the road

A rally driver has to travel two miles at an average speed of 60mph. He covers the first mile at 30mph. How fast must he take the second mile in order to achieve his target?

The GP Record, by Fran Orford
The GP Record, by Fran Orford

The intuitive response is '90mph', but this is wrong. Covering two miles at 60mph takes two minutes - but our driver has already taken two minutes to complete the first mile. It is now impossible to average 60mph over the whole distance, however fast he drives.

This is just like present-day general practice. Increasingly GPs are being given targets which at first seem sensible, but when looked at in detail turn out to be almost impossible.

In principle the QOF was a good idea, because it rewarded good practice. But it has now become too complex for its own good - indeed, so convoluted that organisations regularly hold lectures on how to satisfy each year's new rules. Everyone experiences problems over patients who should (but don't) hit the targets for one reason or another. And then the DoH 'refines' the rules again, often just before the closing date.

The quality and productivity (QP) indicators are even worse. It should be simple to achieve these - just improve your prescribing and referring. But what about those practices which already prescribe and refer carefully? In order to continue receiving a sizeable chunk of their current income they may be gulled into accepting a referral reduction or prescribing target which looks innocuous ... until, like the rally driver, they discover that it's impossible. Then they lose all the money from these sources.

There are some serious truths here. QOF can account for up to a third of a practice's income. That's gross income, by the way, not profit: take away a significant slice of QOF, DES and LES income and many practices won't just experience reduced drawings, they'll go bankrupt. Quality payments are no longer the icing on the cake but part of the cake itself.

So beware: 'Slightly tightened targets' and 'redistributed points' can destabilise practices financially, especially when they involve large numbers of points and require year-on-year betterment. High-quality practices are potentially more vulnerable because they are already efficient and cannot easily deliver further improvements.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

£20 notes spread out

VAT trap for PCNs could strip millions of pounds from general practice

Tens of millions of pounds could be stripped from general practice because work carried...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Is the BMA representing GPs effectively, why GPs face a pension tax hit, and views on the workload crisis

In our regular news review the team discusses representation of GPs, a new survey...

Man sleeping

NICE guidance on insomnia backs app to replace sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people with insomnia could be offered treatment via a mobile...

Health worker prepares a dose of COVID-19 vaccine

JCVI backs autumn COVID-19 booster campaign for high-risk adults and NHS staff

Frontline health and social care staff and adults at increased risk of severe illness...

GP consultation

Government accused of 'misleading' claims on general practice workforce

GP leaders have accused the government of making misleading claims about the general...

Consulting room door

LMC calls for enhanced access to be scrapped after abuse forces practice to close reception

A Midlands LMC has backed a practice forced to close its reception desk after abuse...