Chris Lancelot on ... Funding healthcare

The nationwide delivery of healthcare is not easy. Our much-vaunted NHS has serious defects.

Private insurance schemes are a failure: look at the dreadful situation in the US where large swathes of the population are neither able to afford medicine themselves, nor covered by government insurance schemes. Yet the US spend on healthcare as a percentage of GDP is double that of the UK, because of huge administrative overheads. All this extra money provides a worse overall quality of healthcare than the UK - not that we do so well in the global league tables, either.

There are two difficulties of principle here. Any scheme that is free at the point of need, as in the UK, results in a finite amount of taxpayers' money trying to support infinite demand. On the other hand, generalised personal insurance schemes disadvantage the poor; and the chronically ill either can't get insurance at all or pay extortionately.

There is a third way, described in the economist Tim Harford's recent book The Undercover Economist (Abacus): give everyone the responsibility for spending their own healthcare money. Everyone contributes to their own healthcare fund which is held in a separate bank account, from which they pay for their treatment. The government supplements the individual funds of the poor or the chronically ill. Each citizen also has to take out private insurance against catastrophic illness. Finally - and here's the crunch - unspent funds in the account are eventually returned to the individual or the family.

As a result, everyone has healthcare. Everyone has an incentive to spend their healthcare money wisely and economically. The poor and the chronically ill are not excluded from treatment. Everyone is insured against catastrophic, unpredictable events. There is true competition in medical care: market forces ensure supply meets demand. Dedicated, competent professionals are rewarded and incompetents fall by the wayside. Demand is kept to reasonable levels. Bureaucracy is reduced to a minimum. Costs are kept down and patients have real choice.

A scheme like this has been running in Singapore for two decades. It performs much better than the NHS or the US systems, and for far less cost. We should give it a try in the UK: we might be pleasantly surprised.

Do read the book. It's a cracking good read.

Dr Lancelot is a GP from Lancashire.

GPcolumnists@haymarket.com.

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

RCGP urges GPs to collaborate with pharmacies on flu jabs this year

RCGP urges GPs to collaborate with pharmacies on flu jabs this year

The RCGP and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society have called on GP practices and community...

GP appointments rising fast as COVID-19 cases 'near 10,000 a day'

GP appointments rising fast as COVID-19 cases 'near 10,000 a day'

GP appointments have risen rapidly in recent weeks as schools returned, according...

COVID-19 impact on medical schools risks 'serious damage' to future NHS workforce

COVID-19 impact on medical schools risks 'serious damage' to future NHS workforce

Medical training and the future NHS workforce could be seriously damaged by the financial...

GPonline's news editor wins medical journalism award

GPonline's news editor wins medical journalism award

GPonline news editor Nick Bostock has won News Story of the Year (specialist media)...

How GPs can support patients with 'long COVID'

How GPs can support patients with 'long COVID'

GPs must be ready to support patients with physical, psychological and social problems...

BMA demands 'rule of six' overhaul to prevent further lockdowns

BMA demands 'rule of six' overhaul to prevent further lockdowns

The government must scrap its high-risk ‘rule of six’ and introduce more stringent...