Chris Lancelot: In the face of great change, the BMA lacks vision

Oh dear. Here we go again. The BMA isn't prepared to support the White Paper because it is convinced that it's a plot to privatise the NHS; it risks setting doctor against doctor and disrupting local health economies.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com
The GP Record, by Fran Orford www.francartoons.com

This is so typical of the BMA. It stands on the sidelines, constantly criticising - then, presented with an opportunity that the profession has been requesting for years, turns round and rubbishes it.

Let's apply some basic psychology. Why should the government want the NHS to collapse? Any party which breaks up the NHS knows it will put itself out of power for a generation. And even if destroying the NHS were Conservative policy (which it isn't) the Lib Dems in the cabinet would veto it.

Similarly, those who mutter about 'GPs being set up to fail' are exhibiting signs of paranoia. I will say again: who benefits? No-one - and certainly not the government.

In other words, logic suggests that the government cannot have a hidden agenda.

But in any case, where do openness, decency, integrity and good faith come in? Andrew Lansley (who was once married to a GP and presumably understands GP life quite well) is honouring our abilities by giving us an unprecedented opportunity to reshape the NHS. Why can't the BMA accept his proposals in the spirit with which they have been offered? Is it perhaps that the BMA thinks anything a non-socialist government does is by definition suspect? If so, it needs to be more up-front about its core beliefs - and more open-minded, too.

The White Paper gives us the opportunity to create an NHS guided by clinicians rather than managers, structured for the good of the patients and run by those who understand at the very deepest level the opportunities, problems and nuances involved in the delivery of good quality healthcare. What could be better?

Of course, the White Paper is a huge challenge, but the profession is being given a straightforward offer, which may well prove to be the fulfilment of everything we have ever requested.

The BMA should put its congenital distrust to one side, indulge in some evidence-based politics and then work with the government to make the dream come true.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Medico-legal: Intimate examinations and chaperones during COVID-19

Medico-legal: Intimate examinations and chaperones during COVID-19

Remote consultations are likely to be a key part of general practice for months to...

NHS England promises detail on additional flu funding ‘by end of August’

NHS England promises detail on additional flu funding ‘by end of August’

GPs may have to wait until the end of August to find out details of any additional...

Why 63% of GPs expect to do more home-working after COVID-19

Why 63% of GPs expect to do more home-working after COVID-19

Working from home was one of the key issues raised in GPonline's survey of more than...

Lack of support during the menopause leading female doctors to quit

Lack of support during the menopause leading female doctors to quit

A lack of support during the menopause has led some female doctors to consider reducing...

One in three single-handed GPs at high-risk from COVID-19

One in three single-handed GPs at high-risk from COVID-19

A third of single-handed GPs are at high-risk from COVID-19, which could potentially...

Viewpoint: PCNs can be at the forefront of tackling health inequalities

Viewpoint: PCNs can be at the forefront of tackling health inequalities

Dr Mark Spencer explains how the COVID-19 pandemic helped his primary care network...