Chris Lancelot: Being anti-private firms in the NHS is hypocritical

I'm having a logical problem with one of the arguments used by opponents of the Health Bill - that private firms shouldn't be allowed to tender for NHS contracts because they will put the interests of their shareholders before their patients.

The GP Record, by Fran Orford
The GP Record, by Fran Orford

I can see the point entirely - but then we GPs are private firms, aren't we, with partners as shareholders? So if we object to other private firms taking on NHS work on the grounds of self-interest, shouldn't we say that we ourselves aren't fit to do NHS business either, for exactly the same reason?

There are several potential solutions to this conundrum. The first is to agree that GPs aren't fit persons to hold NHS contracts; therefore to be consistent we should all resign, and on ethical grounds ask the DoH to set up a new primary care division of directly employed NHS GPs. I can't see that happening, somehow.

Maybe we think we are true professionals, so steeped in the NHS ethos that we can rise above mere selfishness? In which case, under GMS why have so few practices offered partnerships to up and coming GPs? (It is cheaper to employ salaried doctors, even if bad for potential GPs' career development.)

And why have the financial incentives of the QOF resulted in a relative de-emphasis on the non-QOF diseases? Maybe we GPs are more self-orientated than we care to admit.

The final alternative of course is to admit that private firms are potentially just as reliable as GPs, and can therefore tender for NHS work: but this approach would imply that our previous objection to third-party contractors in the NHS was unsound.

You can see the problem, can't you? Mind you, I don't have to face it myself: I've never worried about private firms doing NHS work. I'm sure they can be trusted the same as anyone else, especially if the DoH keeps a careful watch on their contracts, volumes and standards.

But if the profession continues to oppose using private firms to do NHS work, then to the outside world we risk appearing to be either illogical or hypocritical. Surely it is far better to graciously accept that third party suppliers could be just as good for the NHS as we GPs are?

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

£20 notes spread out

VAT trap for PCNs could strip millions of pounds from general practice

Tens of millions of pounds could be stripped from general practice because work carried...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Is the BMA representing GPs effectively, why GPs face a pension tax hit, and views on the workload crisis

In our regular news review the team discusses representation of GPs, a new survey...

Man sleeping

NICE guidance on insomnia backs app to replace sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people with insomnia could be offered treatment via a mobile...

Health worker prepares a dose of COVID-19 vaccine

JCVI backs autumn COVID-19 booster campaign for high-risk adults and NHS staff

Frontline health and social care staff and adults at increased risk of severe illness...

GP consultation

Government accused of 'misleading' claims on general practice workforce

GP leaders have accused the government of making misleading claims about the general...

Consulting room door

LMC calls for enhanced access to be scrapped after abuse forces practice to close reception

A Midlands LMC has backed a practice forced to close its reception desk after abuse...