CCG running cost allowance change raises GPC concerns

Changes to the running cost allowances for clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) will pose problems for commissioners who need 'absolute clarity' over funding, the GPC has warned.

CCG funding is now based on different population estimates
CCG funding is now based on different population estimates

GPC negotiator Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that the changes to running costs allowances, which mean that 90 CCGs will receive less money than they have planned for, showed that the timetable for the NHS reforms was extremely short and rushed.

This month, the NHS Commissioning Board (NHSCB) revised the running cost allowances for the 211 shadow CCGs. Running costs are still centred on a £25-per-head figure but are now based on different population estimates.

Running costs will now be based on the Office for National Statistics’ population estimates in September. The September estimates showed an increase from the 2011 census projections to the English population from 53.4m to 53.8m.

The revisions mean that 90 CCGs will see a reduction in their running cost allowances, 115 will see an increase and for six it will remain the same, as the estimates they were given in May.

The NCB said that this had led to the total budget for CCG running costs rising by £10.5m per year to £1.34bn. It said that most CCGs would receive a higher running cost allowance under the new arrangements but that there were some areas where there had been a reduction in the projected population, meaning CCGs would receive less money.

Dr Nagpaul said: ‘There should be absolute clarity at this stage. There is still no clarity around GP IT. We have always felt that the timetable for the changes were extremely short and felt rushed.’

An NHSCB spokeswoman said: ‘The publication of the 2013 population estimates has enabled us to provide a revised, up-to-date set of running costs for CCGs, which ensures they are as accurate as possible and that there is the maximum degree of consistency and fairness nationally. The figures will continue to be revised each year as the ONS revises its population estimates for the following year.

‘CCGs were informed in May that the figures published were indicative and subject to change. The majority of CCGs have actually seen an increase in their projected populations, so as a result will receive a larger running cost allowance than they may have anticipated. In some areas, projected population has decreased, so it is only right that their allowance reflects this.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

BMA House entrance

GPs face pension tax penalties worth 'half their post-tax income'

Rapid swings in inflation could leave GPs facing pension tax penalties worth 'half...

Sign outside BMA House

BMA to demand significant pay rises to combat 15 years of real-term cuts

The BMA is set to demand significant pay rises for all doctors to undo over a decade...

UK police station

Reporting a crime in the practice – the confidentiality dilemma

With incidents of aggressive behaviour from patients on the rise, Dr Emma Green,...

Sign reading 'General Medical Council'

GMC backs reversal of GP suspension over laptop and admits tribunal error

The GMC has admitted a medical tribunal was wrong to suspend a Manchester GP for...

Dr Chaand Nagpaul

Government 'willfully shrinking workforce' and exploiting doctors' goodwill, warns Nagpaul

The government is exploiting doctors' goodwill while persistently failing to adopt...

Vaccination tracker

UK COVID-19 vaccination programme tracker

GPs across the UK have led the largest-ever NHS vaccination programme in response...