Breast screening saves lives but raises overtreatment

Screening for breast cancer saves over 1,000 lives a year but will cause unnecessary harm to thousands more, an independent review has found.

Mammography exammination (Photo: SPL)
Mammography exammination (Photo: SPL)

An independent panel of experts who reviewed the evidence said women screened for breast cancer were 20% less likely to die of the disease.

The review found 1,300 lives are saved each year through the NHS Breast Screening programme, but a further 4,000 women will have tumours diagnosed which would not have caused illness. Overdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary harm from treatments including chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Professor Michael Marmot of University College London, who led the panel, said women needed help when weighing up the benefits and potential harms of screening. 'Clear communication of these harms and benefits to women is essential, and the core of how a modern health system should function,' he said.

Professor Sir Mike Richards, national cancer director, said: 'I welcome the fact that the review clearly recommends that breast screening should continue.

'But the key thing is that we communicate this new information to women so they can make an informed choice for themselves. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes have already asked independent academics to develop new materials to give the facts in a clear, unbiased way. I hope to see them in use in the next few months.'

He added: 'If any woman has concerns about breast screening she should talk to her GP or health professional.'

The NHS Breast Screening programme invites all women aged over 50 every three years.

A review of the benefits and harms from screening was commissioned by the DH and Cancer Research UK in October 2011.

It followed an open letter from Professor Susan Bewley, a consultant obstetrician at King’s College London, who said NHS leaflets had ‘exaggerated benefits and did not spell out the risk’ of screening.

She said: ‘The oft repeated statement that "1,400 lives a year are saved" has not been subjected to proper scrutiny.’

In response, Professor Mike Richards, England’s national cancer director, said a review would  resolve ‘ongoing controversy’ over the programme.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

Renewable energy

GP practices can be 'more ambitious' on tackling climate change

GP practices can be more ambitious in taking steps to tackle climate change than...

GP surgery sign

Risks of being a partner have outstripped benefits, GPs told

The risks of being a partner have become greater that the benefits, the RCGP conference...

Image of Dr Farzana Hussain

GPs urged to use their voices to improve the lives of patients in deprived areas

The can-do attitude and independence of GPs offers a unique opportunity to help reverse...

Professor Sir Michael Marmot

Unequal impact of COVID-19 'utterly predictable' amid rising inequality, says Marmot

The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on people in the most deprived parts of England...

Consulting room door

NHS on course for shortfall of 11,000 GPs within a decade

One in four GP and practice nurse posts will be vacant within a decade without a...

Dr Iona Heath

Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic can help GPs tackle health inequalities

GPs can use evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic to put pressure on the government...