Breast screening controversy triggers review by cancer czar

The NHS breast screening programme will be formally reviewed by an independent panel following doubts over whether its benefits outweigh potential harm.

Professor Richards: according to current advice including from the WHO, breast cancer screening saves lives and the benefits considerably outweigh the harms.
Professor Richards: according to current advice including from the WHO, breast cancer screening saves lives and the benefits considerably outweigh the harms.

Professor Mike Richards, England’s national cancer director, said the review was launched to resolve ‘ongoing controversy’ over the programme.

It follows an open letter from Professor Susan Bewley, a consultant obstetrician at King’s College London, who said NHS leaflets had ‘exaggerated benefits and did not spell out the risk’ of screening.

She said: ‘The oft repeated statement that "1,400 lives a year are saved" has not been subjected to proper scrutiny.’

Research by the Nordic Cochrane Centre had suggested that harms may outweigh the benefits. It advised that screening information should be more balanced.

Responding, Professor Richards wrote in the BMJ that he believed screening programmes ‘should be based on the best available evidence’.

He said that according to current advice including from the WHO, breast cancer screening saves lives and the benefits considerably outweigh the harms.

But an independent review will be conducted to resolve the ‘controversy’, he said.

The government is also establishing a new process for developing information for public consumption about screening programmes, he said.

‘I hope this reassures you that I take the current controversy very seriously,’ he wrote.

He added that, should the review find the balance of harms outweighs the benefits, he will refer the evidence to the National Screening Committee and ministers.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

£20 notes spread out

VAT trap for PCNs could strip millions of pounds from general practice

Tens of millions of pounds could be stripped from general practice because work carried...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Is the BMA representing GPs effectively, why GPs face a pension tax hit, and views on the workload crisis

In our regular news review the team discusses representation of GPs, a new survey...

Man sleeping

NICE guidance on insomnia backs app to replace sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people with insomnia could be offered treatment via a mobile...

Health worker prepares a dose of COVID-19 vaccine

JCVI backs autumn COVID-19 booster campaign for high-risk adults and NHS staff

Frontline health and social care staff and adults at increased risk of severe illness...

GP consultation

Government accused of 'misleading' claims on general practice workforce

GP leaders have accused the government of making misleading claims about the general...

Consulting room door

LMC calls for enhanced access to be scrapped after abuse forces practice to close reception

A Midlands LMC has backed a practice forced to close its reception desk after abuse...