BMA could face judicial review over handling of regional GP committee election

A GP who stood for election to the BMA's GP committee has lodged a formal complaint with the association over its handling of the election process and could seek a judicial review, after hitting out at a 'total lack of transparency'.

BMA House (Photo: Malcolm Case-Green)

Last week, the BMA confirmed that long-standing GP committee member Dr Peter Holden had been re-elected to represent Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire after an election that was re-run last month after a delay of more than six months.

However Dr Shan Hussain, a candidate who also stood for election as the region's GP committee representative, has lodged a formal complaint over the electoral process and is seeking a formal judicial review. The Nottinghamshire GP - who said the election result made an 'absolute mockery of the lengthy investigation and electoral process' - has since been invited by the BMA to attend a 'mediated conversation' over his complaint.

The election was initially held in March this year, but was suspended on 5 March after claims that Dr Holden had broken canvassing rules. An investigation by the BMA's independent scrutineer for elections confirmed a breach of an election process had occurred, but concluded that no individual should be referred to a BMA resolution panel.

GPC regional election

In June, Dr Holden voluntarily withdrew from the election, leaving two nominees - Dr Shan Hussain and Dr Kalindi K Tumurugoti - in the running. However, Dr Holden was allowed to stand again when the election was run in October after a pause of more than six months, following independent legal advice given to the BMA.

Commenting on his re-election, Dr Holden said: 'I was fully investigated under a formal BMA procedure by an external firm of lawyers and I was exonerated.'

However, Dr Hussain has lodged a formal complaint into the electoral process and is seeking a judicial review. In his complaint, Dr Hussain seeks answers to questions around how the BMA conducted the election, the reason for the long delay, and the subsequent investigation and re-opening of the process.

He has asked the BMA to explain:

  • why his initial report to the BMA about a breach of canvassing rules on 4 March didn’t trigger an investigation,
  • why he had to wait over two months for information about when the election would restart,
  • why the incumbent was allowed to stand for another seat within the GPC in June,
  • why some GPs in the area who attempted to vote were unable to do so,
  • why the election was re-opened for just two weeks, instead of four weeks as previously,
  • why the BMA asked him to share emails from his personal account about the election.

Dr Hussain is also seeking ‘full disclosure’ of the legal advice the BMA received around the election, which led it to reopening the election at the nomination stage.

Voting access

In his letter to the BMA, Dr Hussain said: ‘The nature of my complaint surrounds the entirety of the electoral process and the total lack of transparency around events between 8 June and 23 September 2021.

‘I seek explanations into the decision-making processes, reasons why Dr Tumurugoti and I were not kept informed, recognition of the disrespect shown towards us both, and apologies from all relevant parties, including Dr Holden.

‘Given my recent communications with the BMA, I do not have high hopes for a simple resolution of this matter. Whilst I am a BMA member for now, I expect full responses to my questions. But please be advised that I have already appointed a barrister and will almost certainly seek a formal judicial review.’

The election process has been criticised by a number of GPs on Twitter, who have called on the BMA to provide further information. A different candidate in the same region withdrew from the election in March over concerns that rural GPs had been unable to access the voting system.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

NHS prescription and packet of pills

GPs can now prescribe flu antivirals on the NHS

GPs and other prescribers are now able to issue NHS prescriptions for antivirals...

GP sign

Prevention set to be key battleground for 2024 GP contract

Negotiations on a new GP contract from 2024/25 will need to 'align closely' with...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: What makes a strong PCN and how will integrated care systems affect networks?

Talking General Practice speaks to GP and PCN clinical director Professor Aruna Garcea,...


GP core funding rise outstripped by staff pay awards under five-year contract

Staff pay awards have outstripped increases in core GP practice funding between 2019/20...

BMA sign

Fifth of GP time spent on non-medical work as NHS absorbs cost of 'government failure'

Doctors are 'picking up the pieces of government failures' as the cost-of-living...


How the five fundamentals of COPD care can help GPs support patients

GP Dr Andrew Whittamore, clinical lead at Asthma + Lung UK, explains NICE’s five...