Behind the headlines: Do chemicals harm children's brains?

Children's brains may be at risk from chemicals. Sanjay Tanday reports

What is the story?

Toxic chemicals may harm the brains of millions of children around the world triggering a ‘silent pandemic’ of brain disorders, according to media reports.

The press said that one in six children has a developmental disability, such as autism, cerebral palsy or attention deficit disorder, and that up until adolescence, the brain is much more susceptible to toxic chemicals than in adulthood.

The problem with lead, which was used in petrol from 1960 to 1980, illustrated the risk of low exposure of industrial chemicals for children, the papers said.

At least 202 industrial chemicals, including metals, solvents and pesticides, are known to have the capacity to damage the brain and their effects at low levels of exposure are unknown. Household goods were included on the list.

What is the research?

The media reports are based on a joint US and Danish study that involved a systematic examination of the hazardous substances data bank of the US National Library of Medicine and the integrated risk information system of the US Environmental Protection Agency in order to identify the industrial chemicals that are the most likely to damage the developing brain.

Of the 202 chemicals identified, sufficient documentation of toxicity to the developing human brain was found for only five substances, which were lead, methylmercury, arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls and toluene.

Analysis showed that the toxicity of these substances was noted in a similar way. It was normally initiated by recognition of adult toxicity and episodes of poisoning among children.

This was followed by a growing body of epidemiological evidence showing that exposure to low levels of the substances led to neurobehavioural deficits in children.

The researchers concluded that industrial chemicals are responsible for a silent pandemic that has caused impaired brain development in millions of children. It is silent because the subclinical effects of individual toxic chemicals are not apparent in available health statistics.

What does the researcher say?

Lead researcher Dr Philippe Grandjean, from the department of environmental health at the Harvard School of Public Health, said it is vital to protect the developing brain from toxic chemicals.

‘The human brain is a precious and vulnerable organ and because optimal brain function depends on integrity of the organ, even limited damage may have serious consequences,’ he said. ‘We used the term silent pandemic because in the short term the effect is disease.

‘In the long term, however, it will lead to functional problems that will cause children to struggle at school. This will result in many children failing to complete education, resulting in a less economically productive society.’

He added that only a few chemicals, such as lead and mercury, were currently controlled with the purpose of protecting children.

The other 200 chemicals, identified in the review, are known to be toxic to the human brain but are not regulated in the same way.

‘Testing new chemicals before allowing them to be marketed is a highly efficient means of preventing toxicity. Tests to show the effect of chemicals on brain function are urgently needed,’ he said, adding that it would cost  $150,000 (about £80,000) to determine the toxicity of each chemical.

What do the experts say?

Other toxicologists are doubtful of the conclusions. Professor Alan Boobis, a toxicologist at Imperial College London, said: ‘The authors have raised an issue of significant importance, but they have produced some far reaching conclusions that are less secure than they suggest.

The evidence for the silent pandemic, which they refer to, is completely missing. It is an extrapolation of the data.’

Professor Nigel Brown, dean of medicine at St Georges’s School of Medicine, University of London, an expert in developmental toxicology, said: ‘The review does not present any new information. The authors are explicit about the idea that there is a pandemic, but there is not a shred of evidence to support this.’

Informing patients

  • A joint US and Danish review has found that toxic chemicals may cause neurodevelopmental disorders in children.
  • Researchers say they have identified at least 202 industrial chemicals that could be harmful to the brain.
  • Other experts have cast doubt on the review’s findings.
  • No firm evidence to back claims of a silent pandemic.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Just published

Patient satisfaction screen

How a GP practice worked with patients to stop a torrent of complaints

A GP practice has seen complaints drop from 50-plus a day to just four in 10 months...

British Army soldiers marching

How the NHS Op COURAGE service can help support veterans

Armed forces veterans often have unique health needs. Clinical staff from London...

GP consultation

Continuity of care would save millions of GP appointments each year, new study finds

GP workload would be significantly reduced if continuity of care was prioritised...

Talking General Practice logo

Podcast: Visa sponsor shortage threatens GP workforce, locum GPs struggle to find work, record appointments

The GPonline team discusses the key news stories affecting general practice in our...

RCGP sign

RCGP condemns threat to retention funding as third of GPs consider quitting

Funding for GP retention risks being stripped away to cover other financial pressures...

Professor Dame Helen Stokes Lampard

Former RCGP chair joins NHS England board

Former RCGP chair Professor Dame Helen Stokes-Lampard has joined the NHS England...