You might say you are a busy GP and don't have time for research. The very word can cause anxiety, yet without realising it, we are all involved.
It is likely that you are involved, or have received an invitation to be involved, through your local medical school as part of a research network. Or it could be that you have a burning medical question you wish to try to answer.
Much of our practice is now dictated by guidelines. It is easy to assume they are written in tablets of stone, but medical science is constantly changing. Knowledge changes as a result of research and as practising doctors, we should question and challenge what we see.
We are working at the coal face and curiosity about gaps in evidence-based knowledge should encourage us to find out more.
|Differences between audit and research|
Audit and research are two different things, although they may sometimes appear to be quite similar
What is research?
Put simply, research is posing a question and looking for an answer. So often in our consulting rooms, we ask ourselves whether a management plan is correct, based on the latest guideline or something we have been taught in the past.
Sometimes we will ask why we cannot find out what is wrong with a patient or why they are not getting better. Much of our research comes from studies in specialist secondary care, which may not be applicable to general practice.
Disease versus illness
Government targets, such as the QOF, are based on objective parameters that are easy to measure, yet much of our work is with patients who are ill (up to 50% in some studies) but as yet have no identifiable disease.
There is much subjectivity in the care of such patients, where their illness is often influenced by complex psychosocial factors, yet it is difficult to argue to our funders how important this healthcare work is, because it is difficult to measure.
Research conducted at the coal face can help to confirm the importance of this everyday work and to inform government, and so help GPs obtain more recognition and help for their work.
Many experts have written over the years of the importance of the consultation and GPs have unique insights into illness through our patients.
Potentially, each consultation could lead to a research question or idea and open a floodgate. It is important for us to make the observations which in turn, perhaps through commissioning, will win us more resources.
First ask your question
If you have a question (your research question) that, as far as you know, nobody has answered, you may think you know the answer (your hypothesis) and wish to prove it.
To do this, you need to devise a method with an appropriate research tool, for example, a questionnaire. This forms the basis of your protocol.
This is where the academics try to blind you with terminology, such as P values and confidence intervals.
Remember, statistics answer questions about probability, not certainty. So if your observations as a GP differ from the guidelines, you may be right and have a potential research project.
If you have a burning question you want to answer, align yourself to a local university department.
There may be another GP working as a researcher, with whom you can discuss your idea, how you might go about making it into a research project, and any possible funding.
Inevitably, research takes time, and you will require help and funding. A university is a good place to ask for advice. This is the only realistic way a GP can balance general practice with research and for these reasons, being part of a wider project within a university network of GP practices is more straightforward.
- Professor Charlton is a GP in Hampton-in-Arden, and director of undergraduate primary care education at the School of Medicine, University of Nottingham